Article

Article name WOLF'S HOME RANGE AND MOVEMENTS IN DAURIAN STEPPE
Authors

Vadim E. Kirilyuk, PhD, researcher, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution (119071, Russia, Moscow, Leninskiy Av., 33); leading researcher, State Nature Biosphere Reserve “Daursky" (674480, Russia, Zabaikalsky krai, Onosky district, Nizhniy Tsasuchey, Komsomolskaya st., 76); e-mail: vkiriliuk@bk.ru
Anastasia V. Kirilyuk, junior researcher, State Nature Biosphere Reserve “Daursky" (674480, Russia, Zabaikalsky Krai, Onosky District, Nizhniy Tsasuchey, Komsomolskaya st., 76); PhD student, North-East Forestry University (150040, China, Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, Hexing Road, 26); e-mail: akiriliuk@bk.ru
Alexander N. Minaev, senior researcher, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution (119071, Russia, Moscow, Leninskiy Av., 33); e-mail: moosefarmer@mail.ru

Reference to article

Kirilyuk V.Е., Kirilyuk A.V., Minaev A.N. 2019. Wolf's home range and movements in Daurian steppe. Nature Conservation Research 4(4): 91–105. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2019.068

Section Research articles
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2019.068
Abstract

We have studied habitats and movements of four wolves (Canis lupus), using GPS-tracking (an average of 5484 ± 1702.4 SD locations per individual). The study has been carried out in the steppe zone of Central Asia near the Russian–Mongolian border in 2015–2016. Two of the wolves were adults, while two were sub-adults dispersed into new areas during the study period. The considered individuals used favourable habitats and feed sources during the absence of a limiting influence of snow cover and very low impact of human factors. Three of the four wolves lived mainly in Protected Areas. Two of them occupied the cross-border zone using the protection effect of the interstate border. The average size of the home range of resident individuals was 832 ± 79.05 km2 (100% MCP, minimum convex polygon method), and 256 ± 62.4 km2 (95% FK, Kernel method). The obtained values rank second after sites studied for wolves in polar and subpolar latitudes, and, perhaps, they are higher than data obtained in deserts. But our data are higher than the ones obtained in the forest zone. One of the sub-adult males used 5281 km2 during the dispersal period. Sub-adult wolves showed a higher mobility than adults. It was reflected in the speed of their movement, especially during the dispersion period.

Keywords

Canis lupus, Central Asia, Daursky State Nature Reserve, dispersion, natal pack

Artice information

Received: 10.04.2019. Revised: 23.10.2019. Accepted: 03.11.2019.

The full text of the article
References

Ballard W.B., Ayres L.A., Krausman P.R., Reed D.J., Fancy S.G. 1997. Ecology of wolves in relation to a migratory caribou herd in northwest Alaska. Wildlife Monographs 135: 3–47.
Bath S.K., Hayter A.J., Cairns D.A., Anderson C. 2006. Characterization of home range using point peeling algorithms. Journal of Wildlife Management 70(2): 422–434. DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[422:COHRUP]2.0.CO;2
Bibikov D.I., Kudaktin A.N., Filimonov A.N. 1985. Use of area, movement. In: D.I. Bibikov (Ed.): Wolf. Moscow: Nauka. P. 415–431. [In Russian]
Boykov T.G., Kharitonov Yu.D., Rupyshev Yu.A. 2002. Trans-Baikal Steppes: Productivity, feed value, rational use and protection. Ulan-Ude: BCS SB RAS. 232 p. [In Russian]
Byrne M.E., McCoy J.C., Hinton J.W., Chamberlain M.J., Collier B.A. 2014. Using dynamic Brownian bridge movement modeling to measure temporal patterns of habitat selection. Journal of Animal Ecology 83(5): 1234–1243. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12205
Chapron G., Kaczensky P., Linnell J.D., von Arx M., Huber D., Andrén H., López-Bao J.V., Adamec M., Álvares F., Anders O., Balčiauskas L., Balys V., Bedő P., Bego F., Blanco J.C., Breitenmoser U., Brøseth H., Bufka L., Bunikyte R., Ciucci P., et al. 2014. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346(6216): 1517–1519. DOI: 10.1126/science.1257553
Chavez A.S., Gese E.M. 2006. Landscape use and movements of wolves in relation to livestock in a Wildland-agriculture matrix. Journal of Wildlife Management 70(4): 1079–1086. DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[1079:LUAMOW]2.0.CO;2
Ciucci P., Boitani L., Francisci F., Andreoli G. 1997. Home range, activity and movements of a wolf pack in central Italy. Journal of Zoology 243(4): 803–819. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb01977.x
Danilkin A.A. 2009. Wild ungulate population dynamics in Russia: hypotheses, factors, patterns. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 310 p. [In Russian]
Downs J.A., Horner M.W. 2009. A Characteristic-Hull Based Method for Home Range Estimation. Transactions in GIS 13(5–6): 527–537. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2009.01177
Downs J.A., Horner M.W. 2010. Effects of point pattern shape on home range estimates. Journal of Wildlife Management 72(8): 1813–1818. DOI: 10.2193/2007-454
Duan X.N., Chu W.W., Wang Y., Du C.C., He L., Chu H.J. 2016. The largest gray wolf (Canis lupus) home ranges in the world may exist in the Mount Kalamaili Ungulate Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Acta Theriologica Sinica 36(4): 452–458. DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.201604010 [In Chinese]
Dupre E., Corsi F., Boitani L. 1995. Potential distribution of the wolf in Italy: a multivariate based GIS model. In: Conference on European wolf migration. Neuchatel (Schwitzerland). P. 1–12.
ESRI. 2019. Multi–Distance Spatial Cluster Analysis (Ripley's K Function). In: ArcMap 10.3. Available from: http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/spatial–statistics–toolbox/multi–distance–spatial–cluster–analysis.htm
Forshner S.A., Paquet P.C., Burrows F.G.M., Neale G.K., Wade K.D., Samuel W.M. 2003. Demographic patterns and limitation of Grey Wolves, Canis lupus, in and near Pukaskwa National Park, Ontario. Canadian Field Naturalist 118(1): 95–104. DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v118i1.889
Fuller A., Mech L.D., Cochrane J.F. 2003. Wolf populations dynamics. In: L.D. Mech, L. Boitani (Eds.): Wolves behavior, ecology, and conservation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P. 161–191.
Fuller T.K. 1989. Population dynamics of wolves in north-central Minnesota. Wildlife Monograph 105: 3–41.
Galton A., Duckham M. 2006. What is the region occupied by a set of points. In: M. Raubal, H.J. Miller, A.U. Frank, M.F. Goodchild (eds). GIScience: International Conference on Geographic Information Science. Vol. 4197. Berlin: Springer. P. 81–98. DOI: 10.1007/11863939_6
Getz W.M., Wilmers C.C. 2004. A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions. Ecography 27(4): 489–505. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03835.x
Gipson P.S., Warren B.B., Ronald M.N., Mech L.D. 2000. Accuracy and precision of estimating age of gray wolves by tooth wear. Journal of Wildlife Management 64(3): 752–758. DOI: 10.2307/3802745
Hernandez-Blanco J.A., Poyarkov A.D., Krutova V.I. 2005. Wolf (Canis lupus lupus) pack organization at the Voronezh Biosphere Reserve. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 84(1): 80–93. [In Russian]
Jedrzejewski W., Schmidt K., Theuerkauf J., Jedrzejewska B., Kowalczyk R. 2007. Territory size of wolves Canis lupus: Linking local (Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland) and Holarctic-scale patterns. Ecography 30(1): 66–76. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590. 2007.04826.x
Jimenez M.D., Bangs E.E., Boyd D.K., Smith D.W., Becker S.A., Ausband D.E. 2017. Wolf dispersal in the Rocky Mountains, Western United States: 1993–2008. Journal of Wildlife Management 81(4): 581–592. DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21238
Kaartinen S., Antikainen H., Kojola I. 2015. Habitat model for recolonizing Wolf (Canis lupus) population in Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 52(1–2): 77–89. DOI: 10.5735/086.052.0207
Kaczensky P., Enkhsaikhan N., Ganbaatar O., Walzer C. 2008. The Great Gobi B Strictly Protected Area in Mongolia – refuge or sink for wolves Canis lupus in the Gobi? Wildlife Biology 14: 444–456. DOI: 10.2981/0909-6396-14.4.444
Karamanlidis A., Hernando M. de G., Georgiadis L., Kusak J. 2016. Activity, movement, home range and habitat use of an adult gray wolf in a Mediterranean landscape of northern Greece. Mammalia 81(1): 95–99. DOI: 10.1515/mammalia-2015-0091
Kirilyuk V.E., Lushchekina A.A. 2017. Current status of Procapra gutturosa (Bovidae) in Russia. Nature Conservation Research 2(Suppl. 1): 81–99. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2017.018
Kirilyuk O., Kirilyuk V., Maksakovsky N., Kobyakova S., Goroshko O., Tkachuk T., Butorin A., Namkhai A., Urtnasan N., Tseveenmyadag N., Oyungerel B., Dashdorj K., Khapp H.D., Golde A. 2013. Landscapes of Dauria. Potential Serial Transnational World Heritage Property (The Russian Federation and Mongolia). Moscow: Annie. 61 p.
Kirilyuk V.E., Obyazov V.A., Tkachuk T.E., Kirilyuk O.K. 2012. Influence of Climate Change on Vegetation and Wildlife in the Daurian Ecoregion. In: M.J.A. Werger, M.A. van Staalduinen (eds.). Eurasian Steppes. Ecological Problems and Livelihoods in a Changing World. New York – London: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg. P. 397–424.
Kojola I., Aspi J., Hakala A., Heikkinen S., Ilmoni C., Ronkainen S. 2006. Dispersal in an expanding wolf population in Finland. Journal of Mammalogy 87(2): 281–286. DOI: 10.1644/05-MAMM-A-061R2.1
Kojola I., Hallikainen V., Mikkola M., Gurarie E., Heikkinen S., Kaartinen S., Nikula A., Nivala V. 2016. Wolf visitations close to human residences in Finland: The role of age, residence density, and time of day. Biological Conservation. 198: 9–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.025
Kusak J., Skrbinšek A.M., Huber D. 2005. Home ranges, movements, and activity of wolves (Canis lupus) in the Dalmatian part of Dinarids, Croatia. European Journal of Wildlife Research 51(4): 254–262. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-005-0111-2
Lavrenko M.N. 1970. Provincial division of the Central Asian subregion of the Steppe region in Eurasia. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 55(12): 511–526. [In Russian]
Mancinelli S., Boitani L., Ciucci P. 2018. Determinants of home range size and space use patterns in a protected wolf (Canis lupus) population in the central Apennines, Italy. Canadian Journal of Zoology 96(8): 828–838. DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2017-0210
Mattisson J., Sand H., Wabakken P., Gervasi V., Liberg O., Linnell D., Rauset G.R, Pedersen H.Ch. 2013. Home range size variation in a recovering wolf population: evaluating the effect of environmental, demographic, and social factors. Oecologia 173(3): 813–825. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2668-x
Mech L.D. 1992. Day time activity of wolves during winter in Northeastern Minnesota. Journal of Mammalogy 73(3): 570–571. DOI: 10.2307/1382025
Mech L.D. 1994. Regular and homeward travel speeds of arctic wolves. Journal of Mammalogy 75(3): 741–742. DOI: 10.2307/1382524
Mech L.D. 1999. Alpha status, dominance, and division of labor in wolf packs. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77(8): 1196–1203. DOI: 10.1139/z99-099
Mech L.D. 2017. Where Can Wolves Live and How Can We Live with Them? Biological Conservation 210(Part A): 310–317. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.029
Mech L.D., Boitani L. 2003. Wolf social ecology. In: Wolves: behavior, ecology and conservation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P. 1–34.
Minaev A.N., Purikov A.V. 2015. Modern tools of tracking the domesticated elks. In: Elk breeding: problems, searches, solutions: a collection of articles of the interregional scientific and practical conference (9 June 2015). Kostroma: NP «Kantsler». P. 110–120. [In Russian]
Musiani M., Okarma H., Jedrzejewski W. 1998. Speed and actual distances travelled by radiocollared wolves in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (Poland). Acta Theriologica 43(4): 409–416. DOI: 10.4098/AT.arch.98-51
Nilsen E.B., Herfindal I., Linnell J.D.C. 2005 Can intra-specific variation in carnivore home–range size be explained using remote-sensing estimates of environmental productivity? Ecoscience 12(1): 68–75. DOI: 10.2980/i1195-6860-12-1-68.1
Olson D.M., Dinershtein E. 2002. The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89(2): 199–224. DOI: 10.2307/3298564
Olson K.A., Fuller, T.K. 2017. Wildlife hunting in eastern Mongolia: economic and demographic factors influencing hunting behavior of herding households. Mongolian Journal Biological Sciences 15(1–2): 37–46. DOI: 10.22353/mjbs.2017.15.05
Potvin F. 1988. Wolf movements and population dynamics in Papineau-Labelle reserve, Quebec. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66(6): 1266–1273. DOI: 10.1139/z88-185
Rich L.N., Mitchell M.S., Gude J.A., Sime C.A. 2012. Anthropogenic mortality, intraspecific competition, and prey availability influence territory sizes of wolves in Montana. Journal of Mammalogy 93(3): 722–731. DOI: 10.1644/11-MAMM-A-079.2
Reading R.P., Lkhagvasuren B. 1998. The commercial harvest of wildlife in Dornod Aimag, Mongolia. Journal of Wildlife Management 62(1): 59–71. DOI: 10.2307/3802264
Wabakken P., Sand H., Kojola I., Zimmermann B., Arnemo J., Pedersen H., Liberg O. 2010. Multistage, long-ange natal dispersal by a global positioning system-collared Scandinavian wolf. Journal of Wildlife Management 71(5): 1631–1634. DOI: 10.2193/2006-222
Wang L., Ma Y.P., Zhou Q.J., Zhang Y.P., Savolaimen P., Wang G.D. 2016. The geographical distribution of grey wolves (Canis lupus) in China: a systematic review. Zoological Research 37(6): 315–326. DOI: 10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2016.6.315 [In Chinese]
White G.C., Garrot R.A. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. New-York: Academic Press. 383 p.
Worton B.J. 1987. A review of models of home range for animal movement. Ecological Modelling 38(3–4): 277–298. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3800(87)90101-3
Worton B.J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization in home-ranges studies. Journal Ecology 70(1): 164–168. DOI: 10.2307/1938423
Wydeven, A.P., Van Deelen, T.R., Heske, E. 2009. Recovery of gray wolves in the great lakes region of the United States: An endangered species success story. New York: Springer. 350 p.
Yang H.J., Zhang H.H., Dou H.S., Shen X.Q., Yan W.B., 2006. Home Range and Habitat Utilization of Wolves during Winter in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 34(4): 52–53. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2006.04.019 [In Chinese]
Yuan B.D., Zhang H.H., Bao L.M., Dou H.S. 2008. Wolf Predation on Livestock in Dalai Lake Nature Reserve Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Zoology 43(3): 81–86. [In Chinese]