Article
| Article name | THE EFFECT OF FLORAL DISPLAY ON FRUIT SET IN ORCHID POPULATIONS WITH DIFFERENT POLLINATION STRATEGIES IN THE KOMI REPUBLIC (RUSSIA) |
| Authors | Irina A. Kirillova, PhD, Researcher in the Institute of Biology of Komi Scientifc Centre, Ural Branch of RAS (167982, Russia, Syktyvkar, Kommunisticheskaya Str., 28); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-7709; e-mail: kirillova_orchid@mail.ru |
| Reference to article | Kirillova I.A., Kirillov D.V. 2026. The effect of floral display on fruit set in orchid populations with different pollination strategies in the Komi Republic (Russia). Nature Conservation Research 11(1): 102–108. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2026.001 |
| Section | Short Communications |
| DOI | https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2026.001 |
| Abstract | Almost a third of the Orchidaceae species have a deceptive pollination strategy. In the absence of nectar, the most important factor in attracting insect pollinators may be the floral display, i.e. the number of flowers in inflorescence. However, the role of this trait in pollination efficiency is still poorly understood, both in deceptive (nectarless) and rewarding (nectariferous) Orchidaceae species. The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of floral display and plant height on fruit set in Orchidaceae species with various pollination strategies (reward and deceptive) in the Komi Republic (northeastern European Russia). The objects of the study were six threatened Orchidaceae species. Of these, four species, Dactylorhiza cruenta, D. fuchsii, D. maculata, and D. traunsteineri, are characterised by a deceptive pollination strategy, while two species, Gymnadenia conopsea and Platanthera bifolia, offer nectar. It was revealed that deceptive Orchidaceae species bloom earlier than rewarding species, and deceptive species have a lower fruit set (35.4%) compared to rewarding species (90%). The plant height and the time of blooming were related, i.e. early-flowering species were shorter. Statistically significant correlations were found between fruit set and the number of flowers in three deceptive species, Dactylorhiza maculata, D. fuchsii, and D. traunsteineri, and between efficiency of pollination and plant height in Dactylorhiza maculata. Rewarding species, Gymnadenia conopsea and Platanthera bifolia, showed a high fruit set. The fruit set was associated neither with the plant height nor with the floral display. |
| Keywords | deceptive orchid species, deceptive pollination strategy, Orchidaceae, pollination efficiency, rewarding orchid species |
| Artice information | Received: 24.09.2025. Revised: 06.11.2025. Accepted: 10.12.2025. |
 |
The full text of the article |
| References |
Ackerman J.D. 1986. Mechanisms and evolution of food-deceptive pollination systems in orchids. Lindleyana 1(2): 108–113. Blinova I.V. 2008. Orchid pollination in northern latitudes. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists 113(1): 39–47. [In Russian] Blinova I.V. 2009. The estimation of reproductive success of orchid species north of the Arctic Circle in Europe. Herald of Tver State University. Series: Biology and Ecology 12: 76–83. [In Russian] Degteva S.V. (Ed.). 2019. Red Data Book of the Komi Republic. Syktyvkar: Komi Republic Printing House. 768 р. [In Russian] Kindlmann P., Jersáková J. 2006. Effect of floral display on reproductive success in terrestrial orchids. Folia Geobotanica 41: 47–60. Kirillova I.A., Kirillov D.V. 2020. Impact of weather conditions on seasonal development, population structure and reproductive success on Dactylorhiza traunsteineri (Orchidaceae) in the Komi Republic (Russia). Nature Conservation Research 5(Suppl.1): 77–89. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2020.016 Kirillova I.A., Kirillov D.V. 2023. Calypso bulbosa (Orchidaceae) on the northern border of its distribution range (Komi Republic, Russia): population structure, fruit and seed set. Nature Conservation Research 8(2): 81–97. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2023.017 [In Russian] Makino T.T., Sakai S. 2007. Experience changes pollinator responses to floral display size: from size-based to reward‐based foraging. Functional Ecology 21(5): 854–863. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01293.x Mattila E., Kuitunen M.T. 2000. Nutrient versus pollination limitation in Platanthera bifolia and Dactylorhiza incarnata (Orchidaceae). Oikos 89(2): 360–366. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890217.x Neiland M.R.M., Wilcock C.C. 1998. Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae. American Journal of Botany 85(12): 1657–1671. DOI: 10.2307/2446499 Ohashi K., Yahara T. 2001. Behavioural responses of pollinators to variation in floral display size and their influences on the evolution of floral traits. In: L. Chittka, J.D. Thomson (Eds.): Cognitive Ecology of Pollination: Animal Behaviour and Floral Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 274–296. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511542268.015 Parra-Tabla V., Vargas C.F. 2004. Phenology and phenotypic natural selection on the flowering time of a deceit-pollinated tropical orchid, Myrmecophila christinae. Annals of Botany 94(2): 243–250. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch134 Pellegrino G., Bellusci F., Musacchio A. 2010. The effects of inflorescence size and flower position on female reproductive success in three deceptive orchids. Botanical Studies 51(3): 351–356. Primack R., Stacy E. 1998. Cost of reproduction in the pink lady's slipper orchid (Cypripedium acaule, Orchidaceae): an eleven-year experimental study of three populations. American Journal of Botany 85(12): 1672–1679. DOI: 10.2307/2446500 R Core Team. 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from https://www.R-project.org Sabat A.M., Ackerman J.D. 1996. Fruit set in a deceptive orchid: The effect of flowering phenology, display size, and local floral abundance. American Journal of Botany 83(9): 1181–1186. DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13899.x Sletvold N., Ågren J. 2015. Climate‐dependent costs of reproduction: Survival and fecundity costs decline with length of the growing season and summer temperature. Ecology Letters 18(4): 357–364. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12417 Smithson A., Gigord L.D.B. 2003. The evolution of empty flowers revisited. American Naturalist 161(4): 537–552. DOI: 10.1086/368347 Sonkoly J., Vojtkó A., Tökölyi J., Török P., Sramkó G., Illyés Z., Molnár V.A. 2016. Higher seed number compensates for lower fruit set in deceptive orchids. Journal of Ecology 104(2): 343–351. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12511 Suetsugu K., Naito R.S., Fukushima S., Kawakita A., Kato M. 2015. Pollination system and the effect of inflorescence size on fruit set in the deceptive orchid Cephalanthera falcata. Journal of Plant Research 128(4): 585–594. DOI: 10.1007/s10265-015-0716-9 Tremblay R.L., Ackerman J.D., Zimmerman J.K., Calvo R.N. 2005. Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84(1): 1–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00400.x Vallius E. 2001. Factors affecting fruit and seed production in Dactylorhiza maculata (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 135(2): 89–95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2001.tb01083.x Vallius E., Arminen S., Salonen V. 2006. Are there fitness advantages associated with a large inflorescence in Gymnadenia conopsea ssp. conopsea?. Available online: http://www.r-b-o.eu/rbo_public?Vallius_et_al_2006.html Wróblewska A., Ostrowiecka B., Kotowicz J., Jermakowicz E., Tałałaj I., Szefer P. 2024. What are the drivers of female success in food‐deceptive orchids? Ecology and Evolution 14(4): e11233. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11233 |