Article

Article name A NOTE ON POST-FIRE VEGETATION IN PINE FORESTS OF THE MORDOVIA STATE NATURE RESERVE, RUSSIA
Authors

Anatoliy A. Khapugin, PhD, Senior Researcher of the Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park «Smolny» (430005, Russia, Republic of Mordovia, Saransk, Krasnaya Street, 30); Researcher of the Tyumen State University (625003, Russia, Tyumen Region, Tyumen, Volodarskogo Street, 6); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-2779; e-mail: hapugin88@yandex.ru
Alexander B. Ruchin, Dr. Sc., Associate Professor, Director of the Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park «Smolny» (430005, Russia, Republic of Mordovia, Saransk, Krasnaya Street, 30); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-3879; e-mail: ruchin.alexander@gmail.com

Reference to article

Khapugin A.A., Ruchin A.B. 2025. A note on post-fire vegetation in pine forests of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve, Russia. Nature Conservation Research 10(2): 98–102. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2025.012

Electronic Supplement 1. Plant abundance based on the Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale on study plots in the pine (Pinus sylvestris) forests in the Mordovia State Nature Reserve, Russia (Link)

Section Short Communications
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2025.012
Abstract

Wildfires pose dramatic and devastating effects on natural habitats around the world, being important determinants of environmental transformation. At present, pyrogenic successional patterns and forest structure remains quite unknown in damaged ecosystems. This paper was aimed to evaluate the plant abundance in pine (Pinus sylvestris) forests at various burning treatments in the Mordovia State Nature Reserve, European Russia. In 2021–2023, the sampling was performed on 11 permanent plots, including two unburned, three once-burned (in 2010 only), and six twice-burned (in 2010 and 2021) sites. On 11 plots, 36 vascular plant species from 32 genera and 21 families have been registered in total. Expectedly, the results demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) differences between once- and twice-burned plots based on the plant abundance in both ground and shrub-sapling layers, which can also be explained by differences in the time of the post-fire regeneration of the forest ecosystem. Based on plant abundance in the ground layer of burned sites, significant (χ2 = 11.880, p < 0.01) differences were found between the studied years. Significant differences in plant abundance on burned plots were found between 2021 and 2023 (p < 0.01), and 2022 and 2023 (p < 0.05). At the same time, no differences (χ2 = 3.816, p = 0.148) were found between the studied years based on plant abundance in the shrub-sapling layer on burned plots. The obtained results confirm the main patterns of post-fire re-vegetation in forest communities, but require additional studies to make stronger conclusions.

Keywords

burned area, percentage cover, Pinus sylvestris, Protected Area, pyrogenic succession

Artice information

Received: 10.03.2024. Revised: 13.04.2025. Accepted: 12.05.2025.

The full text of the article
References

Anderson M.J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26(1): 32–46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x
Atutova Zh.V. 2023. Post-fire restoration of pine forests in the Badary area, Tunkinskiy National Park, Russia. Nature Conservation Research 8(2): 22–32. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2023.010
Bartalev S.A., Stytsenko F.V., Egorov V.A., Lupyan E.A. 2015. Satellite estimation of forest destruction in Russia from fires. Lesovedenie 2: 83–94. [In Russian]
Bowman D.M.J.S., Balch J.K., Artaxo P., Bond W.J., Carlson J.M., Cochrane M.A., D'Antonio C.M., DeFries R.S., Doyle J.C., Harrison S.P., Johnston F.H., Keeley J.E., Krawchuk M.A., Kull C.A., Marston J.B., Moritz M.A., Prentice I.C., Roos C.I., Scott A.C., Swetnam T.W., van der Werf G.R., Pyne S.J. 2009. Fire in the Earth System. Science 324(5926): 481–484. DOI: 10.1126/science.1163886
Duco R.A.J., Bejar S.G.F., Bañez J.G., Fidelino J.S., Duya M.V., Ong P.S., Duya M.R.M. 2024. Forest fragments matter: a look into the species richness and diversity patterns of birds in a small, isolated, Protected Landscape in Mindanao Island, Philippines. Nature Conservation Research 9(2): 47–60. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2024.012
Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 9.
Khapugin A.A., Vargot E.V., Chugunov G.G. 2016. Vegetation recovery in fire-damaged forests: A case study at the southern boundary of the taiga zone. Forestry Studies 64: 39–50. DOI: 10.1515/fsmu-2016-0003
Kharitonova A.O., Kharitonova T.I. 2021. The effect of landscape pattern on the 2010 wildfire spread in the Mordovia State Nature Reserve, Russia. Nature Conservation Research 6(2): 29–41. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2021.022
Kharuk V.I., Ponomarev E.I., Ivanova G.A., Dvinskaya M.L., Coogan S.C.P., Flannigan M.D. 2021. Wildfires in the Siberian taiga. Ambio 50(11): 1953–1974. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01490-x
Morgan P., Hardy C.C., Swetnam T.W., Rollins M.G., Long D.G. 2001. Mapping fire regimes across time and space: Understanding coarse and fine-scale fire patterns. International Journal of Wildland Fire 10(4): 329. DOI: 10.1071/wf01032
Ogurtsov S.S., Khapugin A.A., Zheltukhin A.S., Fedoseeva E.B., Antropov A.V., Delgado M.M., Penteriani V. 2024. Brown bear food habits in natural and human-modified landscapes in West-European Russia. Ursus 2023(34e11): 1–19. DOI: 10.2192/ursus-d-22-00007
POWO. 2024. Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens. Available from https://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org
Shvetsov E.G., Kukavskaya E.A., Buryak L.V., Barrett K. 2019. Assessment of post-fire vegetation recovery in Southern Siberia using remote sensing observations. Environmental Research Letters 14(5): 055001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab083d
Smith-Ramírez C., Castillo-Mandujano J., Becerra P., Sandoval N., Allende R., Fuentes R. 2021. Recovery of Chilean Mediterranean vegetation after different frequencies of fires. Forest Ecology and Management 485: 118922. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118922
Stevens-Rumann C., Morgan P. 2016. Repeated wildfires alter forest recovery of mixed-conifer ecosystems. Ecological Applications 26(6): 1842–1853. DOI: 10.1890/15-1521.1
Vasilyev A.G., Lukyanova L.Е., Gorodilova Yu.V. 2023. Coupled variation of red-backed vole species in biotopes disturbed by windfall and fire in the Visim State Nature Reserve (the Middle Urals). Nature Conservation Research 8(3): 24–46. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2023.020
Vilà-Cabrera A., Saura-Mas S., Lloret F. 2008. Effects of fire frequency on species composition in a Mediterranean shrubland. Écoscience 15(4): 519–528. DOI: 10.2980/15-4-3164
Whitman E., Parisien M.A., Thompson D.K., Flannigan M.D. 2019. Short-interval wildfire and drought overwhelm boreal forest resilience. Scientific Reports 9(1): 18796. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55036-7
Yue C., Luo C.F., Shu L.F., Shen Z.H. 2020. A review on wildfire studies in the context of global change. Acta Ecologica Sinica 40(2): 385–401. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201812202762