Article

Evgeny V. Barbazyuk, PhD, Researcher of the Steppe Institute, Ural Branch of RAS (460000, Russia, Orenburg, Pionerskaya Street, 11); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-6993; e-mail: argentatus99@yandex.ru
Pavel V. Velmovsky, PhD, Senior Researcher of the Steppe Institute, Ural Branch of RAS (460000, Russia, Orenburg, Pionerskaya Street, 11); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0492-6850; e-mail: velmovski@mail.ru

Barbazyuk E.V., Velmovsky P.V. 2025. Winter avifauna in the Buzuluksky Pine Forest National Park (Russia) and its landscape-biotopic differentiation. Nature Conservation Research 10(2): 43–57. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2025.010

Buzuluksky Pine Forest National Park (Russia) is an isolated forest with a total area of 866 km², located entirely in the steppe biome in the south-east of the East European Plain. Route quantitative counts during the frosty period were carried out according to the Russian generally accepted methodology of Yu.S. Ravkin in 2012, 2013 and 2024. The total length of the counting route was 160.2 km, including 87.1 km in the deciduous forest and 73.1 km in the pine forest. The assessment of species diversity in two habitats was performed based on the number of species and their abundance using rarefaction curves, ANOSIM, NMDS, SIMPER methods, and the IndVal index. A comparison of the winter avifauna of the pine forest and deciduous forest in the Buzuluksky Pine Forest National Park showed that these two habitats differed in the abundance of birds, but not in the species composition. In general, the abundance and number of species (species richness) were significantly higher in the deciduous forest than in the pine forest, but the species list of the pine forest was only a depleted analogue of the deciduous forest. Despite the considerable representation of Pinus sylvestris in the pool of forest-forming species of the Buzuluksky Pine Forest National Park (50.8%), the pine forest in winter did not have a specific avifauna, i.e. it had no indicator species, which sustainably inhabited its area. Of the 33 bird species found in total, 30 species were recorded in the deciduous forest and 22 species in the pine forest. Non-parametric tests showed that the total abundance of species, both in absolute and average values, was significantly higher in the deciduous forest. Four species made the greatest contribution to the heterogeneity of the two habitats: Parus montanus, Spinus spinus, Acanthis flammea, and Pyrrhula pyrrhula. In total, the contribution of these species was 62.3% according to the SIMPER test results. The comparison of species diversity in two habitats by the ANOSIM test showed a low and statistically non-significant level of differences. The low R value did not allow us to talk about fundamentally different sets of bird species in these two forest types. The IndVal index indicated a very low biotopical relationship of birds with the pine forest. In pine forests, there were not only reliably important indicator species, but also species with an index value above 60%. On the other hand, several statistically significant indicator species were found in the deciduous forest and a group of species with IndVal index values above 60%. In winter, Dendrocopos leucotos, Pyrrhula pyrrhula, Corvus cornix, Sitta europaea, Dryocopus martius, and also Spinus spinus, Acanthis flammea, Parus caeruleus, Parus major, Garrulus glandarius, and Certhia familiaris were well associated with the deciduous forest type. The lack of significant indicator species in the pine forest during the frosty period, which demonstrate strong relationship with this habitat, might probably be explained by the island character of these steppe pine forests, and their isolation from the areas of boreal avifauna. Artificial and structurally deficient pine plantings, compared to well-structured natural forests, the percentage of which was more than half of the total pine forest area, could also contribute to the depletion of the avifaunistic complex of this habitat type.

abundance, biotope, birds, diversity, deciduous forest, indicator species, pine forest

Received: 19.11.2024. Revised: 30.04.2025. Accepted: 04.05.2025.

Anderson M.J., Walsh D.C. 2013. PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing?. Ecological monographs 83(4): 557–574. DOI: 10.1890/12-2010.1
Baranovsky A.V., Avdeeva N.V. 2012. The abundance of birds in various forest types in the Meshchersky National Park. Modern High Technologies 4: 9–11. [In Russian]
Belik V.P. 1999. On the avifauna of the steppe Orenburg Region. In: Materials for the distribution of birds in the Urals, Cis-Urals and Western Siberia. Yekaterinburg: Yekaterinburg Publishing House. P. 11–13. [In Russian]
Betts M.G., Yang Z., Hadley A.S., Smith A.C., Rousseau J.S., Northrup J.M., Nocera J.J., Gorelick N., Gerber B.D. 2022. Forest degradation drives widespread avian habitat and population declines. Nature Ecology and Evolution 6(6): 709–719. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01737-8
Borovikov V.P. 2003. STATISTICA. The art of data analysis on a computer: for professionals. St. Petersburg: Piter. 688 p. [In Russian]
Clarke K.R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18(1): 117–143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x
Dagan U., Izhaki I. 2019. Understory vegetation in planted pine forests governs bird community composition and diversity in the eastern Mediterranean region. Forest Ecosystems 6: 29. DOI: 10.1186/s40663-019-0186-y
Dufrêne M., Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67(3): 345–366. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO;2
Gregory R. 2006. Birds as Biodiversity Indicators for Europe. Significance 3(3): 106–110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2006.00178.x
Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1): 9.
Hayes F.E., Samad I. 1998. Diversity, abundance and seasonality of birds in a Caribbean pine plantation and native broad-leaved forest at Trinidad, West Indies. Bird Conservation International 8(1): 67–87. DOI: 10.1017/S0959270900003646
Isachenko T.I., Lavrenko E.M. (Eds.). 1979. Vegetation map of the European part of the USSR. Scale 1:2500000. Leningrad: Scientific and editorial cartographic part of the GUGK [In Russian]
Kin N.О. 2018. Resistance of Natural Pine Forests Cenoses at the Southern Limit of the Range of Pinus sylvestris to Alien Floral Elements. Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series «Biology. Ecology» 23: 32–42. [In Russian]
Kin N.O., Velmovsky P.V. 2023. The role of natural and anthropogenic factors in the restoration of post-pyrogenic forest ecosystems of the Buzuluk Pine Forest. In: Theoretical and applied aspects of the organization, conduct and use of monitoring observations. Minsk: ICC of the Ministry of Finance. P. 206–210. [In Russian]
Klimentyev A.I. 2010. Buzuluk Pine Forest: soils, landscapes and factors of the geographical environment. Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch of RAS. 401 p. [In Russian]
Knorre E.P. 1941. Materials on the ornithofauna of the Buzuluk State Nature Reserve (results for 1928–1941). The manuscript. In: Quality inventory of birds and animals of the Buzuluk Pine Forest State Reserve. Koltubanovsky: Buzuluk Pine Forest State Nature Reserve. Folder 21. P. 31–94. [In Russian]
Koblik E.A., Arkhipov V.Yu. 2014. Avifauna in countries of Northern Eurasia (former USSR): Checklists. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 171 p. [In Russian]
Litvinova A.S. (Ed.). 2020. The project for the development of forests located on the lands of the Buzuluksky Pine Forest National Park, transferred to Buzuluksky Pine Forest National Park for the permanent (perpetual) use. Vol. 1. Koltubanovsky: Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation, Buzuluksky Bor National Park. 346 p. [In Russian]
Lupinos M.Yu., Gashev S.N. 2012. Population and ecology of birds in the «Chusovaya River» Nature Park. Tomsk State University Journal of Biology 1(17): 95–108. [In Russian]
Mamaev S.A. 1983. Coniferous species in the Urals and their use in landscaping. Sverdlovsk: USC of the AS USSR. 110 p. [In Russian]
Melnikov Yu.I. 2003. Species composition, structure and population density of birds of the Goloustnaya River basin (Primorsky Ridge) in winter Russian Journal of Ornithology 231: 831–844 [In Russian]
Naumkin D.V. 2010. Bird Population in the Pine and Birch Forests of Kungurskii Raion (Perm' Krai) under Anthropogenic Load of Various Levels. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 3(1): 76–80. DOI: 10.1134/S1995425510010121
Preobrazhenskaya E.S., Stopalova O.A. (Eds.). 2012. Results of winter bird counts in Russia and neighboring regions. Vol. 26. Moscow: Russian Bird Conservation Union. 55 p. [In Russian]
Preobrazhenskaya E.S., Stopalova O.A. (Eds.). 2013. Results of winter bird counts in Russia and neighboring regions. Vol. 27. Moscow: Russian Bird Conservation Union. 60 p. [In Russian]
Ravkin Y.S., Livanov S.G. 2008. Factor zoogeography: principles, methods and theoretical generalizations. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 205 p. [In Russian]
Ryabitsev V.K. 2008. Birds of the Urals, Cis-Urals and Western Siberia: Birds Reference Guide. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House. 633 p. [In Russian]
Shemyakina O.A. 2001. Structure of bird communities of the main habitats near Pskov. Russian Journal of Ornithology 155: 694–705. [In Russian]
Smolyakov E.I., Litvinova A.S. 2018. The project of forestry organization and management carried out by the Buzuluksky Pine Forest National Park. Taxonomic description of the Borovoi-Experimental Forestry. Orenburg: NPP Giprozem LLC. 539 p. [In Russian]
Sukachev V.N. 1931. Forest types of Buzuluk Pine Forest. Leningrad: Leninsky Forestry Research Institute Publishing House. 284 p. [In Russian]
Vartapetov L.G., Zheleznova T.K. 2017. Spatial organization of bird communities of Prytymye. Tomsk State University Journal of Biology 40: 116–131. [In Russian]
Velmovsky P.V., Chibilyov A.A. 2019. Preservation of the old-growth relic Buzuluk pine forest under conditions of oil field development. South of Russia: ecology, development 14(2): 59–69. DOI: 10.18470/1992-1098-2019-2-59-69 [In Russian]
Vogeler J.C., Hudak A.T., Vierling L.A., Evans J., Green P., Vierling K.T. 2014. Terrain and vegetation structural influences on local avian species richness in two mixed-conifer forests. Remote Sensing of Environment 147: 13–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.006
Warton D.I., Wright T.W., Wang Y. 2012. Distance-based multivariate analyses confound location and dispersion effects. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3(1): 89–101. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00127.x
Żmihorski M. 2008. Can clearcuts increase bird species richness in managed forests?. Journal of Forest Science 54(4): 189–193. DOI: 10.17221/787-JFS