Article

Danila V. Panchenko, PhD, Senior Researcher of the Institute of Biology of the Karelian Research Centre of RAS (185910, Russia, Republic of Karelia, Petrozavodsk, Pushkinskaya Street, 11); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1955-4196; email: danja@inbox.ru
Antti K.J. Paasivaara, PhD, Research Scientist of the Natural Resource Institute Finland (Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 HELSINKI, Finland); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6499-9181; email: antti.paasivaara@luke.fi
Marja S.A. Hyvarinen, Research Technician of the Natural Resource Institute Finland (Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 HELSINKI, Finland); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7581-9251; e-mail: marja.hyvarinen@luke.fi
Yuri A. Krasovskij, Senior Researcher of the Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve (186930, Russia, Republic of Karelia, Kostomuksha, Priozernaya Street, 2); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5857-4862; e-mail: lafanj@yandex.ru

Panchenko D.V., Paasivaara A., Hyvärinen M., Krasovskij Yu.A. 2021. The wild forest reindeer, Rangifer tarandus fennicus, in the Metsola Biosphere Reserve, Northwest Russia. Nature Conservation Research 6(Suppl.1): 116–126. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2021.026

The existence of the wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus) in North Europe is under threat. Urgent measures are needed to protect this species. One of the main measures under consideration is the development of a network of Protected Areas (PAs). The Russian part of the Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve includes a part of the Metsola Biosphere Reserve (MBR). The MBR contains habitats of the Kuhmo Area – Lake Kiitehenjärvi's (Lake Kamennoe) R.t. fennicus subpopulation and it is of great importance for this animal. This area mainly includes summer pastures and rutting and calving areas, while some of these animals also use this area as winter pastures. Tracking animal locations and moving activity with telemetry showed the continuation of seasonal migrations of this animal across the Russian-Finnish border. This confirms the mix of animals living in Finland in the region of Kainuu and animals living in the Republic of Karelia (Russia), as well as the importance of the MBR for maintaining the genetic diversity of R.t. fennicus in both countries. Some of the animals may change their migration patterns and seasonal home ranges, staying in Russia for wintering. There was one case of a collared R.t. fennicus female moving far to the east from the Kuhmo Area – Lake Kiitehenjärvi subpopulation's habitat to the surroundings of the village of Chernyi Porog (Segezhsky district). The genetic purity of R.t. fennicus is influenced by the reindeer husbandry practice in Finland. There are cases of semi-domesticated reindeer (i.e. originating from another Rangifer tarandus subspecies, R. t. tarandus) occurrence in the MBR, where they were observed in mating (harem) groups of R. t. fennicus. Evaluation and analysis of the age and sex structure of the subpopulation in the summer-autumn period in Russia in 2018–2020 showed a small percentage of calves, approximately 12% of all encountered animals. This may indicate a high predator pressure (e.g. from the side of Canis lupus, Gulo gulo, and Ursus arctos). Over the last three years, out of 16 collared R.t. fennicus females appeared in Karelia, four of them were killed by predators. The location of the habitats near the state border west of the fence, protected with barbed wire (engineered structures) together with control in the PAs (including MBR) ensure the animal protection from poachers. There was only one case of animal death caused by illegal hunting over the last five years. Forest logging may have a significant impact on the future of R.t. fennicus in the MBR. Under conditions of increasing human impact on the surrounding areas, the MBR importance in the R.t. fennicus population conservation also increased. However, to enhance the positive effect, it will be necessary to expand the network of PAs. One of the nearest promising potential PAs is the planned Kalevala Sanctuary.

biodiversity, human impact, migration, Protected Area, rare species, telemetry, ungulates

Received: 09.12.2020. Revised: 24.02.2021. Accepted: 01.03.2021.

Altizer S., Harvell D., Friedle E. 2003. Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18(11): 589–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.013
Annenkov V.G., Blyudnik L.V., Danilov P.I., Markovsky V.A., Heikura K. 1989. Comparative characteristics of winter pastures of forest reindeer in Eastern Fennoscandia. In: Forest reindeer of Fennoscandia. Petrozavodsk: Karelian branch of AS USSR. P. 35–46. [In Russian]
Blyudnik L.V., Danilov P.I., Markovsky V.A., Heikura K., Annenkov V.G. 1989. About daily and seasonal movements of forest reindeer in Karelia ASSR (1986–1988). In: Forest reindeer of Fennoscandia. Petrozavodsk: Karelian branch of AS USSR. P. 47–54. [In Russian]
Caughley G., Gunn A. 1996. Conservation biology in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Blackwell Science. 453 p.
Curatolo J.A., Murphy S.M. 1986. The effects of pipelines, roads, and traffic on the movements of caribou, Rangifer tarandus. Canadian Field-Naturalist 100(2): 218–224.
Danilov P.I. 2003. Wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus Lönnb.) in the Russian European North. Rangifer Report 7: 37.
Danilov P.I. 2005. Game animals of Karelia: ecology, resources, management and conservation. Moscow: Nauka. 340 p. [In Russian]
Danilov P.I., Zimin V.B., Ivanter T.V., Lapshin N.V., Markovsky V.A., Annenkov V.G. 1977. Faunistic review of terrestrial vertebrates. In: Biological resources of the Kostomuksha district, ways of development and protection. Petrozavodsk: Karelian branch of AS USSR. P. 109–127. [In Russian]
Danilov P.I., Panchenko D.V., Tirronen K.F. 2020. The reindeer of Eastern Fennoscandia. Petrozavodsk: KRC RAS. 187 p. [In Russian]
Efimov V.A., Mamontov V.N. 2014. Wild reindeer monitoring in the taiga zone of the Arkhangelsk region. Herald of Game Management 11(2): 166–170. [In Russian]
Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34(1): 487–515. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419
Formozov A.N. 1932. The formula for the accounting of mammals by their tracks. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 11(2): 66–69. [In Russian]
Gunn A. 2016. Rangifer tarandus. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available from https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/29742/22167140
Haigh J., Keay M.G., Gerwing V., Erdenbaatar J., Nansalmaa M. 2006. Disease Problems in Mongolian Reindeer. In: Advances in deer biology: deer in a changing world. Prague: Research Institute of Animal Production. P. 73–74.
Hansen M.C., Potapov P.V., Moore R., Hancher M., Turubanova S.A., Tyukavina A., Thau D., Stehman S.V., Goetz S.J., Loveland T.R., Kommareddy A., Egorov A., Chini L., Justice C.O., Townshend J.R.G. 2013. High-resolution global maps of 21^st-century forest cover change. Science 342(6160): 850–853. DOI: 10.1126/science.1244693
Hanski I. 2005. The shrinking world: ecological consequences of habitat loss. Oldendorf: International Ecology Institute. 307 p.
Heikura K. 1997. Some aspects on the recent changes in the Kuhmo – Lake Kiitechensjarvi subpopulation of the wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus Lönnb). In: T. Lindholm, R. Heikkilä, M. Heikkilä (Eds.): Ecosystems fauna and flora of the Finnish-Russian Nature Reserve Friendship. Helsinki: Finnish Environment Institute. P. 203–211.
Heikura K., Pulliainen E., Danilov P., Erkinaro E. 1985. Wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus Lönnb). Its historical and recent occurrence and distribution in Finland and Karelian ASSR (USSR) with special reference to the development and movement of the Kuhmo (Finland) – Kamennoje ozero subpopulation. Aquilo, Series Zoologica 23: 22–45.
Kholodov E.V. 2013. Wild forest reindeer in Vodlozero National Park. Proceedings of State Petrozavodsk University 2(131): 33–35. [In Russian]
Kie J.G. 2013. A rule-based ad hoc method for selecting a bandwidth in kernel home-range analyses. Animal Biotelemetry 1: 13. DOI: 10.1186/2050-3385-1-13
Kojola I. 2007. The impact of large carnivores on wild forest reindeer population in Finland. Suomen Riista 53: 42–47.
Kojola I., Huitu O., Toppinen K., Heikura K., Heikkinen S., Ronkainen S. 2004. Predation on European wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) by wolves (Canis lupus) in Finland. Journal of Zoology 263(3): 229–235. DOI: 10.1017/S0952836904005084
Kojola I., Tuomivaara J., Heikkinen S., Heikura K., Kilpeläinen K., Keränen J., Paasivaara A., Ruusila V., Heikura K. 2009. European Wild Forest Reindeer and Wolves: Endangered Prey and Predators. Annales Zoologici Fennici 46(2): 416–422. DOI: 10.5735/086.046.0602
Kovalevskiy Y., Gaydysh I. 2017. Extract from cadastral data in the Kalevala National Park and Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve for the period of 2013–2016. Available from https://www.kostzap.com/ [In Russian]
Kumpula J., Colpaert A., Anttonen M. 2007. Does forest harvesting and linear infrastructure change the usability value of pastureland for semi-domesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus)?. Annales Zoologici Fennici 44: 161–178.
Kurten B. 1968. Pleistocene Mammals of Europe. Chicago: Aldine. 317 p.
Lacy R.C. 1997. Importance of genetic variation to the viability of mammalian populations. Journal of Mammalogy 78(2): 320–335. DOI: 10.2307/1382885
Liukko U.M., Henttonen H., Kauhala K., Kojola I., Kyheröinen E.M., Pitkänen J. 2019. Mammals. In: E. Hyvärinen, A. Juslén, E. Kemppainen, A. Uddström, U.M. Liukko (Eds.): The 2019 Red List of Finnish Species. Helsinki: Ministry of Environment and Finnish Environment Institute. P. 571–575.
LUKE. 2020. Finnish forest reindeer. Available from https://www.luke.fi/en/natural-resources/game-and-hunting/finnish-forest-reindeer/
Mamontov V.N. 2020. Individual daily habitats and daily movements of wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus Lönnb.) in the east part of the Republic Karelia. Herald of Game Management 17(1): 4–10. [In Russian]
Mattila E., Helle T. 1978. Winter pasture inventory of the middle reindeer management area. Folia Forestalia 358: 1–31.
McInturff A., Xu W., Wilkinson C.E., Dejid N., Brashares J. 2020. Fence Ecology: Frameworks for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Fences. BioScience 70(11): 971–985. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa103
Nandintsetseg D., Bracis C., Olson K., Böhning-Gaese K., Calabrese J., Buyanaa C., Fagan W., Fleming C., Heiner M., Kaczensky P., Leimgruber P., Dalannast M., Stratmann T., Mueller T. 2019. Challenges in the conservation of wide-ranging nomadic species. Journal of Applied Ecology 56(8): 1916–1926. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13380
Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation of 24 March 2020 No.162 «On approval of the List of wildlife objects listed in the Red Book of the Russian Federation». Official Internet portal of legal information. 2020. Available from http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202004020020/
Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation of 11 January 2012 No.1 «On approval of the Methodological Instructions on the implementation by the executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation of the transferred authority of the Russian Federation to carry out state monitoring of hunting resources and their habitats by winter track count». Electronic Fund of legal and regulatory and technical documentation. 2012. Available from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902325152/
Paasivaara A., Gavrilov M., Juntunen A., Kokko S., Korhonen L., Ovaskainen R., Timonen P. 2018a. Wild forest reindeer counts 2017. In: Game animals counts 2017. Helsinki: Natural Resources Institute. P. 18–23.
Paasivaara A., Kaartinen S., Puoskari V., Rytkönen S, Pusenius J. 2018b. Summer habitats of wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus Löb.) in Finland – A preliminary predictive model. In: Dynamics of game animals populations in Northern Europe. Petrozavodsk: KarRC RAS. P. 207–208.
Panchenko D.V., Danilov P.I., Tirronen K.F., Blyudnik L.V. 2014. On the problem of the status of reindeer in the White sea area. Herald of Game Management 11(2): P. 171–175. [In Russian]
Penteriani V., Lamamy C., Kojola I., Heikkinen S., Bombieri G., Delgado M. 2021. Does artificial feeding affect large carnivore behaviours? The case study of brown bears in a hunted and tourist exploited subpopulation. Biological Conservation 254: 108949. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108949
Pöllänen A. 2020. Variation in the survival of wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus) caused by large carnivores. MSc Thesis. Oulu: University of Oulu. 34 p.
Powell R.A. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In: L. Boitani, T. Fuller (Eds.): Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. New York: Columbia University Press. P. 65–110.
Priklonsky S.G. 1972. Instructions for the winter track count. Moscow: Kolos. 16 p. [In Russian]
Pulliainen E., Sulkava S., Erkinaro E., Heikura K., Lindgren E. 1983. Seasonal movements of the wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus) in eastern Finland. Acta Zoologica Fennica 175: 15–16.
Pulliainen E., Danilov P., Heikura K., Erkinaro E., Sulkava S., Lindgren E. 1985. The familiar area hypothesis and movement pattern of wild forest reindeer in Karelia, Northern Europe. Rangifer 6(2): 235–240. DOI: 10.7557/2.6.2.652
QGIS. 2020. QGIS A Free and Open Source Geographic Information System. Available from: https://qgis.org/ru/site/
Rankama T., Ukkonen P. 2001. On the early history of the wild reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) in Finland. Boreas 30(2): 131–147. DOI: 10.1111/j.1502-3885.2001.tb01218.x
Red Data Book of East Fennoscandia. Helsinki: Finnish Environment Institute, 1998. 351 p.
Red Data Book of the Republic of Karelia. Belgorod: Constanta, 2020. 448 p. [In Russian]
Roed K.H., Haigh J.C., Gerving V., Keay M. 2006. Genetic distinctiveness of isolated and threaten tsaan reindeer. In Advances in deer biology: deer in a changing world. Prague: Research Institute of Animal Production. P. 86.
SASGIS. 2020. SAS.Planet. Available from http://www.sasgis.org/sasplaneta/
Semenov-Tyan-Shansky O.I. 1977. Reindeer. Moscow: Nauka. 94 p. [In Russian]
Serrouya R., McLellan B.N., van Oort H., Mowat G., Boutin S. 2017. Experimental moose reduction lowers wolf density and stops decline of endangered caribou. PeerJ 5: e3736. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3736
Steiniger S., Hunter A.J.S. 2013. A scaled line-based kernel density estimator for the retrieval of utilization distributions and home ranges from GPS movement tracks. Ecological Informatics 13: 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.10.002
Sulkava S., Erkinaro E., Heikura K., Lindgren E., Pulliainen E. 1983. Food of the wild forest reindeer, Rangifer tarandus fennicus, in Finland in winter and summer 1981. Acta Zoologica Fennica 175: 17–19.
Tuomivaara J., Heikura K. 2010. Development of the number of individuals in the Kuhmo-Kamennoje ozero subpopulation of the wild forest reindeer (Rangifer tarandus fennicus Lönnb.) from 1950's to 2010 with special reference to the passed decade. Herald of Game Management 7(2): 229–233.
UNESCO. 2020. Metsola Biosphere Reserve. Available from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/biosphere-reserves/europe-north-america/russian-federation/metsola/
Vanninen E. 1972. Kuhmon peurahistoriikki. Suomen Luonto 31: 231–232.
Vereshchagin N.K. 1979. Ungulates of the North-West of Russia in the Quaternary period. In: Ungulates of the North-West of the USSR. Leningrad: Nauka. P. 5–62. [In Russian]
Vistnes I., Nellemann C. 2008. The matter of spatial and temporal scales: a review of reindeer and caribou response to human activity. Polar Biology 31(4): 399–407. DOI: 10.1007/s00300-007-0377-9
Wilson R.R., Parrett L.S., Joly K., Dau J.R. 2016. Effects of roads on individual caribou movements during migration. Biological Conservation 195: 2–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.035
Worton B.J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70(1): 164–168. DOI: 10.2307/1938423