Ekaterina O. Korolkova, PhD, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of department of Botany, Institute of Biology and Chemistry, Moscow State University of Education (119991, Russia, Moscow, Malaya Pirogovskaya Str., 1/1); Associate Professor of department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, National Research University Higher School of Economics (101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya Str., 20); e-mail:
Anna V. Mironova, PhD student of Laboratory of Mire Ecosystems, Institute of Biology of the Karelian Research Centre of RAS (185910, Russia, Karelia, Petrozavodsk, Pushkinskaya Str., 11; e-mail:

Reference to article

Korolkova E.O., Mironova A.V. 2019. Recreational sustainability of bog plant communities in Polistovsky State Nature Reserve (Russia). Nature Conservation Research 4(4): 73–80.

Section Research articles

The definition of recreational sustainability in bogs is becoming an urgent task in Russia as a result of ecological tourism developed in Protected Areas. In this study, we assessed the impact of recreational nature management on wetland plant communities of the Plavnitskoye Boloto ecological path in the Polistovsky State Nature Reserve solving the following tasks: 1) to determine the threshold of permissible anthropogenic impact on wetland sites with different types of plant communities; 2) to evaluate the recovery of vegetation cover; 3) to determine the relative tolerance of bog plant communities to trampling. Modelling of the direct anthropogenic impact on bog plant communities with different load values has made it possible to assess the damage on the vegetation cover visually and to reveal their resistance and ability to subsequent recover. We demonstrated that the Phragmites-Sphagnum community (Phragmites australis + Eriophorum vaginatum — Sphagnum fallax + Sphagnum angustifolium) was the least resistant to trampling, while the shrub-Carex-Sphagnum plant community (Chamaedaphne calyculata + Oxycoccus palustris + Menyanthes trifoliata + Eriophorum vaginatum — Sphagnum fallax) was the most resistant. After the removal of anthropogenic load on the studied sites, the damaged vegetation cover recovered to different degrees. In the first year, the plant communities of the shrub-Carex-Sphagnum bog had the fastest recovery, where relatively hygrophilous species of Sphagnum mosses predominate under mesotrophic conditions and a higher level of groundwater. The Eriophorum-Sphagnum community (Pinus sylvestris (f. willkomii) ― Andromeda polifolia + Oxycoccus palustris + Eriophorum vaginatum + Rhynchospora alba ― Sphagnum magellanicum) had the best long-term resilience for three years, and, as a result, it turned out to be the most tolerant to trampling. In some parts of the Phragmites-Sphagnum mesotrophic bog, the original plant community did not recover after three study years. Thus, this type of bog is the most vulnerable to recreational impact.


anthropogenic impact, ecological tourism, Protected Areas, recreation, wetland

Artice information

Received: 12.04.2019. Revised: 02.10.2019. Accepted: 17.10.2019.

The full text of the article

Botch M.S. 1981. Effect of recreational trampling on peat bog's vegetation (on the example of string bog the Leningrad region). In: VI All-Union conference «Human-induced changes, conservation of vegetation in wetlands and adjacent areas». Minsk: Nauka i technika. Р. 108–113. [In Russian]
Botch M.S., Masing V.V. 1979. Mire ecosystems in the USSR. Leningrad: Nauka. 188 p. [In Russian]
Chizhova V.P. 2011. Recreational landscapes: resilience, regulation, management. Smolensk: Ecumene. 176 p. [In Russian]
Cole D.N. 1995a. Experimental trampling of vegetation. I. Relationship between trampling intensity and vegetation response. Journal of Applied Ecology 32(1): 203–214. DOI: 10.2307/2404429
Cole D.N. 1995b. Experimental trampling of vegetation. II. Predictors of resistance and resilience. Journal of Applied Ecology 32(1): 215–224. DOI: 10.2307/2404430
Cole D.N. 1995c. Recreational Trampling Experiments: Effects of Trampler Weight and Shoe Type. Research paper INT. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. United States 425(8): 1–4. DOI: 10.2737/INT-RN-425
Hammitt W.E., Cole D.N., Monz C.A. 2015. Wildland Recreation: Ecology and Management. 3rd edition. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell. 334 p.
Hassel K., Kyrkjeeide M., Yousefi N., Presto T., Stenoien H., Show A., Flatberg K.I. 2018. Sphagnum divinum (sp. nov.) and S. medium Limpr. and their relationship to S. magellanicum Brid. Journal of Bryology 40(18): 197–222. DOI: 10.1080/03736687.2018.1474424
Korolkova Е.О., Shkurko A.V. 2016a. The ecological routes on the mire ecosystems of protected areas of the European Russia educational potential. Biology at School 4: 72–80. [In Russian]
Korolkova Е.О., Shkurko A.V. 2016b. The sustainability of bog plant communities of the Polistovsky nature reserve for the recreation impact. Environment and Human: Ecological Studies 4: 50–77. [In Russian]
Korolkova Е.О., Shkurko A.V. 2017. The recreation sustainability of bog plant communities of the Polistovsky nature reserve. In: VIII meeting in memoriam of Ekaterina Alexeevna Galkina. Saint-Petersburg. P. 53–55.
Korolkova Е.О., Shkurko A.V. 2019. Valuation of the impacts of recreation on plant communities of mires. In: X meeting in memoriam of Ekaterina Alexeevna Galkina. Saint-Petersburg. P. 100–102.
Korolkova Е.О., Zueva N.V., Arkhipov V.Yu., Shkurko A.V., Anissimova A.G. 2017. Features of ecological tourism in wetland ecosystems on of the Rdeysky nature reserve example. Environment and Human: Ecological Studies 4: 78–93. [In Russian]
Kose M., Tammiste D.E. 2018. Bog tourism in Estonia: how to measure the impact of bogshoeing? In: IX meeting in memoriam of Ekaterina Alexeevna Galkina. Saint-Petersburg. P. 97–98.
Marzano M., Dandy N. 2012. Recreational use of forests and disturbance of wildlife – a literature review. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission. 40 p.
Mironov V.L., Kondratyev A.Y. 2017. Peat moss Sphagnum riparium follows a circatrigintan growth rhythm in situ: a case report. Chronobiology International 34(7): 981–984. DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1329208
Mironov V., Kondratyev A., Shkurko A. 2018. Growth of Sphagnum riparium is strongly rhythmic: contribution of the seasonal, circalunar and third rhythmic components. BioRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/415539
Nature of Polistovsky Reserve. In: Web-site of the Polistovsky State Nature Reserve. 2019. Available from:
Pickering C., Rossi D. A., Hernando A., Barros A. 2018. Current knowledge and future research directions for the monitoring and management of visitors in recreational and protected areas. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 21: 10–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2017.11.002
Sirin A.A., Minayeva T.Y. 2001. Peat bogs of Russia: to the analysis of industry information. Мoscow: Geos. 190 p. [In Russian]
Slater F.M., Agnew A.D. 1977. Observations on a peat bog's ability to withstand increasing public pressure. Biological Conservation 11(1): 21–27. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(77)90023-4
Zelenkevich N.A., Grummo D.G., Sozinov O.V. 2008. The impact of recreational pressure on vegetation of sphagnum bogs. Botany: research 35: 45–53. [In Russian]