Article

Grigory V. Olenev, Dr.Sc., Head of Laboratory of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch RAS, Russia (620144, Russia, Yekaterinburg, 8 Marta St., 202); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-8896-7915; e-mail: olenev@ipae.uran.ru
Elena B. Grigorkina, PhD, Senior Researcher of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch RAS, Russia (620144, Russia, Yekaterinburg, 8 Marta St., 202); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8797-6211; e-mail: grigorkina@ipae.uran.ru

Olenev G.V., Grigorkina E.B. 2026. Extreme drought of 1975 in the forest zone of the Southern Urals (Ilmen State Nature Reserve): dynamics of rodent populations and consequences. Nature Conservation Research 11(1): 49–70. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2026.005

Climate change consequences assessing for environment and humans is one of the main tasks facing ecology and has great practical significance. Long-term studies of small rodent populations have contributed fundamentally to the development of population ecology. Extreme drought in the forest zone of the Southern Urals in 1975 is one of the rarest phenomena, a climatic event (once in a century), and it is considered as a contrasting background that provides for especially clear manifestation mechanisms of adaptive resistance in animals populations. In the paper, we present for the first time the 52-year dynamics of species structure of the rodent community and population abundance data, obtained in the Ilmen State Nature Reserve (Chelyabinsk Region, Southern Urals, Russia) before and after the drought of 1975 and its remote consequences. We tested the hypothesis about the similar population responses to both an extreme drought and normal autumn-winter conditions. The drought was verified by a dendrochronological indicator (radial growth of Pinus sylvestris trunks) and two climatic parameters, namely soil humidity (for the first time) and precipitation amount. Population dynamic phase portraits demonstrate species-specific features concerning mainly abundance levels before and after the extreme episode: dynamic stability of Clethrionomys glareolus and C. rutilus; abundance increase of Sylvaemus uralensis; collapse of population abundance of Microtus agrestis, M. arvalis, and Alexandromys oeconomus. Species composition (local species lists) turned out to be a reliable indicator of drought. Based on both original functional-ontogenetic approach and individual marking (CMR-method) data, the species populations' response patterns to drought were studied. In summer 1975, the Clethrionomys species have implemented a response strategy, which historically developed for regular winter conditions, reflected in complete blocking of yearlings sexual maturation (minimisation of metabolic processes) as we hypothesised originally. The next year, we observed population adaptations included breeding period prolongation of overwintering females and intergenerational crossing (age cross), which provide effective utilisation of possibilities for population growth along with preservation of yearlings and improvement of genetic heterogeneity. The Sylvaemus uralensis population demonstrated a similar response pattern to drought, reflected in partial blocking of yearlings' sexual maturation, then a gradual increase in the number of individuals up to a high dynamic level in recent decades. In contrast, Microtus agrestis, M. arvalis, and Alexandromys oeconomus populations are characterised by the usual participation in reproduction of both overwintering individuals and yearlings in drought year (i.e. our hypothesis has not been confirmed). As a consequence, there was a mass mortality and abrupt transition of the populations to the critically low abundance level of its oscillations and elimination. An invasion of an alien species (Apodemus flavicollis) was recorded for the first time in 2020. The weather anomaly triggered rapid long-term changes in the biotic community structure, by reflecting in the increase in population abundance of granivorous/seed-eating species (Clethrionomys glareolus, C. rutilus, Sylvaemus uralensis), the finding of a new species (Apodemus flavicollis), and changing of co-dominant (Sylvaemus uralensis instead of previous Microtus agrestis), and, finally, disappearance of herbivorous species (Microtus agrestis, M. arvalis, and Alexandromys oeconomus). Thus, long-term monitoring of rodent populations in forest ecosystem of the Ilmen State Nature Reserve revealed a real possibility of the rapid population rearrangements on evolutionary scale in populations of the local fauna as a result of extreme drought. Drought exposure consequences in the studied Rodentia species are markedly extended in time, being fixed in a series of generations.

abundance, animals, Protected Area, response pattern, soil humidity, monitoring, species composition, threshold effect

Received: 02.10.2025. Revised: 19.12.2025. Accepted: 01.01.2026.

Abt K.F., Bock W.F. 1998. Seasonal variations of diet composition in farmland field mice Apodemus spp. and bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus. Acta Theriologica 43(4): 379–389. DOI: 10.4098/AT.arch.98-49

Araújo W.S., Silveira L.T., Falcão L.A.D., Vieira T.M., Martins W.P., Nunes Y.R.F., Grandez-Rios J.M. 2024. Impact of vereda dryness on the insect herbivore diversity in adjacent cerrado areas in Brazilian Protected Areas. Nature Conservation Research 9(2): 90–99. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2024.016

Butorina L.A., Polyakov O.V., Dementyev A.I. (Eds.). 1991. Ilmen State Nature Reserve. Chelyabinsk: South-Urals Book Publishing House. 160 p. [In Russian]

Chernov Yu.I. 2008. Ecology and Biogeography. Selected works. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 580 p. [In Russian]

Chibilev A.A., Chibilev A.A. 2012. Urals natural zoning based on latitudinal belts, elevation zones and vertical differentiation of landscapes. Proceedings of Samara Scientific Center of RAS 14(1): 1660–1665. [In Russian]

De Meester L., Stoks R., Brans K.I. 2018. Genetic adaptation as a biological buffer against climate change: Potential and limitations. Integrative Zoology 13(4): 372–391. DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12298

Dupal T.A., Litvinov Yu.N. 2024. Community of small mammals in the patchy landscape of Northern Kulunda (Western Siberia). Contemporary Problems of Ecology 17(2): 219–226. DOI: 10.1134/S1995425524020021 [In Russian]

Falk D.A., van Mantgem P.J., Keeley J.E., Gregg R.M., Guiterman C.H., Tepley A.J., Young D.J.N., Marshall L.A. 2022. Mechanisms of forest resilience. Forest Ecology and Management 512: 120129. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120129

Fernandes G.W., Price P.W. 1988. Biogeographical gradients in galling species richness: tests of hypotheses. Oecologia 76(2): 161–167. DOI: 10.1007/BF00379948

Fritts H. 1976. Tree rings and climate. London: Academic Press. 567 p.

Glotov N.V. 1992. Analysis of the genotype-environment interaction in natural populations. Acta Zoologica Fennica 191: 47–55.

Gorchakovsky P.L. 1968. Vegetation. In: Urals and Cis-Urals. Moscow: Nauka. P. 211–261. [In Russian]

Grigorkina E.B., Olenev G.V. 2024. Long-term changes in the small mammal population of the forest-steppe zone of the Southern Urals caused by extreme drought. Russian Journal of Ecology 55(6): 461–471. DOI: 10.1134/S1067413624602653

Grigorkina E.B., Olenev G.V., Tarasov O.V. 2015. Alternative types of small mammal ontogeny: contribution to the radiobiology and radioecology. Doklady Biological Sciences 461(1): 96–99. DOI: 10.1134/S0012496615020088

Grigorkina E.B., Olenev G.V., Smirnov N.G. 2019. Winter reproduction of cyclomorphic mammals: from a case to the phenomenon. Doklady Biological Sciences 485(1): 52–55. DOI: 10.1134/S0012496619020108

Haase P., Frenzel M., Klotz S., Musche M., Toll S. 2016. The long-term ecological research (LTER) network: relevance, current status, future perspective and examples from marine, freshwater and terrestrial long-term observation. Ecological Indicators 65: 1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.040

Hansson L. 1985. The food of bank voles, wood mice and yellow‑necked mice. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 55: 41–168.

Hansson L., Larsson T.B. 1978. Vole diet on experimentally managed reforestation areas in northern Sweden. Ecography 1(1): 16–26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1978.tb00934.x

Hobbs R.J., Higgs E., Harris J.A. 2009. Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24(11): 599–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012

Huberty A.F., Denno R.F. 2004. Plant water stress and its consequences for herbivorous insects: a new synthesis. Ecology 85(5): 1383–1398. DOI: 10.1890/03-0352

Ims R.A., Henden J., Killengreen S.T. 2008. Collapsing population cycles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23(2): 79–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.010

Ims R.A., Yoccoz N.G. 2017. Ecosystem-based monitoring in the age of rapid climate change and new technologies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 29: 170–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.01.003

Jordan S., Giersch J.J., Muhlfeld C.C., Hotaling S., Fanning L., Tappenbeck T.H., Luikart G. 2016. Loss of genetic diversity and increased subdivision in an endemic alpine stonefly threatened by climate change. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0159931 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159931

Kaydanov L.Z. 1996. Genetics of Populations. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 320 p. [In Russian]

Kar R.K. 2011. Plant responses to water stress: role of reactive oxygen species. Plant Signaling and Behavior 6(11): 1741–1745. DOI: 10.4161/psb.6.11.17729

Kislyi A.A., Ravkin Y.S., Starikov V.P. 2025. Distribution of the field vole (Microtus agrestis (Linnaeus, 1761), Rodentia, Cricetidae, Arvicolinae) in western Siberia. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 104(4): 104–113. DOI: 10.31857/S0044513425040098 [In Russian]

Kryštufek B., Tesakov A.S., Lebedev V.S., Bannikova A.A., Abramson N.I., Shenbrot G. 2020. Back to the future: the proper name for red-backed voles is Clethrionomys Tilesius and not Myodes Pallas. Mammalia 84(2): 214–217. DOI: 10.1515/mammalia-2019-0067

Kukarskih V.V., Modorov M.V., Devi N.M., Mikhailovskaya L.N., Shimalina N.S., Pozolotina V.N. 2021. Radial growth of Pinus sylvestris in the East Ural Radioactive Trace (EURT): Climate and ionizing radiation. Science of the Total Environment 781(5): 146827. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146827

Lissovsky A.A., Sheftel B.I., Saveljev A.P., Ermakov O.A., Kozlov Yu.A., Smirnov D.G., Stakheev V.V., Glazov D.M. 2019. Mammals of Russia: species list and applied issues. Archives of Zoological Museum of Moscow State University 56: 1–191. [In Russian]

Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Alberti M., Folke C., Moran E., Pell A.N., Deadman P., Kratz T., Lubchenco J., Ostrom E., Ouyang Zh., Provencher W., Redman Ch.L., Schneider S.H., Taylor W.W. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317(5844): 1513–1516. DOI: 10.1126/science.1144004

Mori A.S., Lertzman K.P., Gustafsson L. 2017. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 54(1): 12–27. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12669

Olenev G.V. 2002. Alternative types of ontogeny in cyclomorphic rodents and their role in population dynamics: an ecological analysis. Russian Journal of Ecology 33(5): 321–330. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020213709830

Olenev G.V. 2009. Determining the age of cyclomorphic rodents: functional–ontogenetic determination, ecological aspects. Russian Journal of Ecology 40(2): 93–104. DOI: 10.1134/S1067413609020040

Olenev G.V., Grigorkina E.B. 2014. Functional patterns of life activities of rodent populations in the winter season. Russian Journal of Ecology 45(6): 480–489. DOI: 10.1134/S1067413614060101

Olenev G.V., Grigorkina E.B. 2016. Evolutionary ecological analysis of adaptation strategies of rodent populations under extreme conditions. Russian Journal of Ecology 47(5): 486–492. DOI: 10.1134/S106741361605009X

Osakabe Y., Osakabe K., Shinozaki K., Tran L.S.P. 2014. Response of plants to water stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 5(1): 86. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00086

Polyakov I.Ya. 1954. On the theory of forecasting the abundance of small rodents. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 15(2): 91–108. [In Russian]

Porporato A., Daly E., Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2004. Soil water balance and ecosystem response to climate change. American Naturalist 164(5): 625–632. DOI: 10.1086/424970

Rozenberg G.S., Zinchenko T.D., Rozenberg A.G. 2023. Hierarchy of ecological homeostasis as a principle of systemology. Izvestiya Rossiiskoy Akademii Nauk. Biologia 7: 118–128. DOI: 10.31857/S1026347023600231 [In Russian]

Ruthrof K.X., Breshears D.D., Fontaine J.B., Froend R.H., Matusick G., Kala J., Miller B.P., Mitchell P.J., Wilson Sh.K., van Keulen M., Enright N.J., Law D.J., Wernberg T., Hardy G.E.J. 2018. Subcontinental heat wave triggers terrestrial and marine, multi-taxa responses. Scientific Reports 8(1): 13094. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31236-5

Semenov V.A. 2024. Climate change: causes, consequences, imperatives. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences 94(3): 246–254. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587324030076 [In Russian]

Shchipanov N.A., Kalinin A.A. 2024. The role of biodiversity in ensuring the functioning of ecosystems: Paper 2. Small mammals in the ecological monitoring system: obtaining data and assessment of the diversity, state, and dynamics of ecosystems. Biology Bulletin 51(2): 443–462. DOI: 10.1134/S106235902360530X

Sheftel B.I., Yakushov V.D. 2022. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial species in the Middle Yenisei taiga. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 15(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1134/S1995425522010073

Shvarts S.S. 1977. The evolutionary ecology of animals. Ecological mechanisms of the evolutionary process. New York: Consultants Bureau. 292 p.

Shvarts S.S., Smirnov V.S., Dobrinskiy L.N. 1968. Method of morphophysiological indicators in the ecology of terrestrial vertebrates. Sverdlovsk: Ural Branch of AS USSR. 378 p. [In Russian]

Shvidenko A.Z., Schepaschenko D.G., Kraxner F., Onuchin A.A. 2017. Transition to sustainable forest management in Russia: theoretical and methodological backgrounds. Siberian Journal of Forest Science 6: 3–25. DOI: 10.15372/SJFS20170601 [In Russian]

Smith F.A., Murray I.W., Harding L.E., Lease H.M., Martin J. 2014. Life in an extreme environment: a historical perspective on the influence of temperature on the ecology and evolution of woodrats. Journal of Mammalogy 95(6): 1128–1143. DOI: 10.1644/13-MAMM-S-070

Soininen E.M., Magnusson M., Jepsen J., Eide N.E., Yoccoz N.G., Angerbjörn A., Breisjøberget J.I., Ecke F., Ehrich D., Framstad E., Henttonen H., Hörnfeldt B., Killengreen S., Olofsson J., Oksanen L., Oksanen T., Tveito O.E., Ims R. 2025. Macroecological patterns of rodent population dynamics shaped by bioclimatic gradients. Ecography 2025(5): e07058. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.07058

Sukhodolets V.V. 2004. Fitness and ecological resistance. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 65(5): 417–425 [In Russian]

Tchabovsky A.V., Savinetskaya L.E., Surkova E.N., Ovchinnikova N.L., Kshnyasev I.A. 2016. Delayed threshold response of a rodent population to human-induced landscape change. Oecologia 182(4): 1075–1082. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3736-9

Vasilyev A.G., Lukyanova L.Е., Gorodilova Yu.V. 2023. Coupled variation of red-backed vole species in biotopes disturbed by windfall and fire in the Visim State Nature Reserve (the Middle Urals). Nature Conservation Research 8(3): 24–46. DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2023.020 [In Russian]

Vasilev D.Y., Vodopianov V.V., Semenov V.A., Chibilev A.A. 2020. Analysis of trends in aridity changes for the Southern Ural Region over the period 1960–2019 using various methods. Doklady Earth Sciences 494(1): 748–752. DOI: 10.1134/S1028334X20090214

POWO. 2024. Plants of the World Online. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. Available from http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/

Wieczorek M., Zub K., Szafrańska P.A., Książek A., Konarzewski M. 2015. Plant-herbivore interactions: silicon concentration in tussock sedges and population dynamics of root voles. Functional Ecology 29(2): 187–194. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12327

Zakharov I.A. 2020. Ecological genetics and modern problems of the biosphere. Biology Bulletin Reviews 10(6): 543–550. DOI: 10.1134/S2079086420060092

Zakharov V.M., Trofimov I.E., Yakushov V.D., Sheftel B.I. 2023. Developmental stability, population dynamics and climate change, with particular reference to the common shrew (Sorex araneus L., 1758) in central Siberia. Izvestiya Rossiiskoy Akademii Nauk. Biologia 7: 23–28. DOI: 10.31857/S1026347023600164 [In Russian]