Article

Alina E. Yakimova, PhD, Senior Researcher of Institute of Biology of the Karelian Research Centre of RAS (185910, Russia, Republic of Karelia, Petrozavodsk, Pushkinskaya Street, 11); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-9196-1808; e-mail: angelina73@mail.ru
Irina S. Gaidysh, PhD, Vice-Director for Research, Environmental Education and Environmental Monitoring of the Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve (186930, Russia, Republic of Karelia, Kostomuksha, Priozernaya Street, 2); iD ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6211-8213; e-mail: kost.zap.nauka@mail.ru

Yakimova A.E., Gaidysh I.S. 2021. The species composition and abundance of terrestrial small mammals in the Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve. Nature Conservation Research 6(Suppl.1): 127–136. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2021.028

The Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve is a relatively undisturbed area, where human influence on ecosystems is small. Research here is particularly important as this area is a highly vulnerable northern forest land and an essential element of the Green Belt of Fennoscandia. Small mammals are often used as model objects in studies of a great variety of ecological issues. Generalised data are provided on the species composition and abundance of small mammals encountered in model areas in the Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve during specialised surveys in 1995–2003. Activities on the Finnish side were carried out in the Elimyssalo Nature Reserve, featuring virgin coniferous forests and numerous small mires and streams, and in the Ulvinsalo Strict Nature Reserve, which also contains undisturbed coniferous forest areas, wetlands and small rivers, and falls under strict protection regulations. On the Russian side, research was done in the Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve: along the phenological route and in the Kalivo locality. The first area was monitored on a long-term basis for environmental changes, which was somewhat disturbed by infrastructural developments in the Kostomuksha District, in the Kalivo locality, mostly occupied by undisturbed native coniferous forests. We found that the small mammal populations are typical for north-boreal Fennoscandia. The number of species encountered in the areas over the study period is however significantly lower than in Finland or Karelia. This suggests that the study area has been understudied. A comparison of the species composition and abundance of small mammals among the models areas showed that the universal dominants were Sorex araneus and Myodes glareolus, while the presence of other species in the samples varied. The analysis of variations in the mammal abundance revealed a spatial synchronisation of fluctuations in some pairs of the model areas for dominant species, while all other species demonstrated various degrees of agreement in abundance variations. In addition, a temporal synchronisation of abundance fluctuations of some species was registered on each studied site. The studies on the species composition and abundance of small mammals in the Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve need to be extended both by continuing the time series of surveys and by implementing specialised activities to study the environmental factors influencing this mammal group.

abundance, dominants, insectivores, population dynamics, rodents, spatial and temporal synchronisation

Received: 23.08.2020. Revised: 14.02.2021. Accepted: 19.03.2021.

Bashenina N.V. 1977. Methods of adaptations of mouse-like rodents. Moscow: Nauka. 354 p. [In Russian]
Batzli G.O. 1975. The role of small mammals in arctic ecosystems. In: Small mammals: their productivity and population dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 243–268.
Belousova N.A., Danilov P.I., Zimin V.B., Korshunov G.T., Kuznetsov O.L. 1988. Kostomuksha State Nature Reserve. In: Reserves of the USSR. Reserves of the European part of the RSFSR. Part 1. Moscow: Mysl. P. 90–100. [In Russian]
Bjørnstad O.N., Ims R.A., Lambin X. 1999. Spatial population dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14(11): 427–432. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01677-8.
Bobretsov A.V. 2016. Population ecology of small mammals of plain and mountain landscapes of North-East of the European part of Russia. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 381 p. [In Russian]
Boonstra R., Krebs C.J. 2012. Population dynamics of red-backed voles (Myodes) in North America. Oecologia 168(3): 601–620. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2120-z
Boychuk М.А., Gorkovets V.Ya., Rayevskaya М.B. 2017. Moss flora of the Russian-Finnish Friendship Park. In: International and interregional connectivity of Protected Areas in the European North. Petrozavodsk: Karelian Research Centre. P. 15–17. [In Russian]
Bugmyrin S.V., Bespyatova L.A., Anikanova V.S., Ieshko E.P. 2008. Parasites of small mammals in Friendship Park. Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of RAS 13: 32–40. [In Russian]
Diekmail C.R. 1999. Rodent-ecosystem relationships: a review. In: G. Singelton, L. Hids, H. Leirs, Z. Zhang (Eds.): Ecologically based rodent management. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agriculture Research. P. 113–133.
Erlinge S., Dannel K., Frodin P., Hasselquist D., Nilsson P., Olofsson E.B., Svensson M. 1999. Asynchronous population dynamics of Siberian lemmings across the Palaearctic tundra. Oecologia 119(4): 493–500. DOI: 10.1007/s004420050812
Gromtsev A.N., Shelekhov A.M. 1997. Forests in the Kostomuksha Nature Reserve: natural characteristics and dynamic pattern. In: Ecosystems, fauna and flora of the Finnish-Russian Nature Reserve Friendship. Helsinki. P. 43–51.
Gromtsev A.N., Kolomytsev V.A., Shelekhov A.M. 1997. The landscapes of the Kostomuksha Nature Reserve In: Ecosystems, fauna and flora of the Finnish-Russian Nature Reserve Friendship. Helsinki. P. 31–42.
Haapakoski M., Ylönen H. 2010. Effects of fragmented breeding habitat and resource distribution on behavior and survival of the bank vole (Myodes glareolus). Population Ecology 52(3): 427–435. DOI: 10.1007/s10144-010-0193-x
Hanski I., Henttonen H., Korpimäki E., Oksanen L., Turchin P. 2001. Small-rodent dynamics and predation. Ecology 82(6): 1506–1520. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)
082[1505:SRDAP]2.0.CO;2
Heikkilä R., Lindholm T. 2009. Achievements of Finnish-Russian research cooperation in Friendship Park research centre. Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of RAS 2: 91–102.
Henttonen H. 1997. The rodent project at Pallasjärvi. In: L. Loven, S. Salmela (Eds.): Pallas-Symposium. Helsinki: Finnish Forest Research Institute. P. 49–58.
Henttonen H., Hansson L. 1993. Temporal Variability and Geographical Patterns in the Population Density of Microtine Rodents: A Reply to Xia and Boonstra. American Naturalist 144(2): 329–342. DOI: 10.1086/285678
Henttonen H., Kaikusalo A., Tast J., Viitala J. 1977. Interspecific competition between small rodents in Subarctic and boreal ecosystems. Oikos 29(3): 581–590. DOI: 10.2307/3543596
Hiutu O., Norrdahl K., Koprimäki E. 2003. Landscape effects on temporal and spatial properties of vole population fluctuations. Oecologia 135(2): 209–220. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1171-6
Hiutu O., Norrdahl K., Koprimäki E. 2004. Competition, predation and interspecific synchrony in cyclic small mammal communities. Ecography 27(2): 197–206. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03684.x
Hoset K.S., Steen H. 2007. Relaxed competition during winter may explain the coexistence of two sympatric Microtus species. Annales Zoologici Fennici 44(6): 415–424.
Ims R.A., Fuglei E. 2005. Trophic interaction cycles in tundra ecosystems and the impact of climate change. Bioscience 55(4): 311–322. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0311:TICITE]2.0.CO;2
Ivanter E.V. 2017. Revising the ecological concept of peripheral populations. Russian Journal of Ecology 48(1): 81–85. DOI: 10.1134/S1067413617010076
Ivanter E.V. 2018. Essays on the population ecology of small mammals on the northern periphery of the range. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 770 p. [In Russian]
Ivanter E.V., Ivanter T.V. 1986. To the ecology of the field vole (Microtus agrestis L.). In: Ecology of terrestrial vertebrates of the North-West of the USSR. Petrozavodsk. P. 64–91. [In Russian]
Ivanter E.V., Korosov A.V. 1998. Small mammals as indicators of environmental violations. In: Problems of environmental toxicology. Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University. P. 83–91. [In Russian]
Ivanter E.V., Korosov A.V., Yakimova А.Е. 2015. Ecological and statistical analysis of long-term changes in the abundance of small mammals at the northern limit of the range (Northeastern Ladoga region). Russian Journal of Ecology 46(1): 89–95. DOI: 10.1134/S1067413615010063
Kalela O. 1962. On the fluctuations in the numbers of arctic and boreal small rodents as a problem of production biology. Annales Academia Scientiarum Fennica. Ser. A IV. Biologica 66: 1–38.
Karaseva E.V., Telitsina A.Yu., Zhigalskii O.A. 2008. The methods of studying rodents in the wild nature. Moscow: LKI. 416 p. [In Russian]
Koprimäki E. 1986. Predation causing synchronous decline phases in microtine and shrew populations in western Finland. Oikos 46(1): 124–127. DOI: 10.2307/3565390
Koprimäki E., Norrdahl K. 1991. Numerical and functional responses of Kestrels, Short-eared Owls, and Long-eared Owls to vole densities. Ecology 72(3): 814–826. DOI: 10.2307/1940584
Koprimäki E., Brown P.R., Jakob J., Pech R.P. 2004. The puzzles of population cycles and outbreaks of small mammals solved? BioScience 54(12): 1071–1079. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1071:TPOPCA]2.0.CO;2
Korpela K., Helle P., Henttonen H., Korpimäki E., Koskela E., Ovaskainen O., Pietiäinen H., Sundell J., Valkama J., Huitu O. 2014. Predator-vole interactions in northern Europe: the role of small mustelids revised. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1797): 20142119. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2119
Koshkina T.V. 1971. Interspecies competition in rodents. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists 76(1): 50–62. [In Russian]
Koshkina T.V. 1980. Characteristics of population cycles of small rodents in the sub-Arctic (based on the example of voles and lemmings in the Kola Peninsula). In: Mechanisms for regulating the number of lemmings and voles in the Far North. Vladivostok. P. 77–81. [In Russian]
Krebs C.J. 1996. Population cycles revisited. Journal of Mammalogy 77(1): 8–24. DOI: 10.2307/1382705
Krebs C.J., Kenney A.J., Gilbert S., Danell K., Angerbjorn A., Erlinge S., Bromley R.G., Shank C., Carriere S. 2002. Synchrony in lemming and vole populations in the Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80(8): 1323–1333. DOI: 10.1139/z02-120
Krebs C.J., Reid D., Kenney A.J., Gilbert S. 2011. Fluctuations in lemming populations in north Yukon, Canada, 2007–2010. Canadian Journal of Zoology 89(4): 297–306. DOI: 10.1139/z11-004
Kupriyanova I.F. 1980. Comparative ecology of voles of the genus Myodes in the middle taiga of the Arkhangelsk region. In: Rodents. Moscow: Nauka. P. 220–222. [In Russian]
Kutenkov A.P. 2006. Thirty years functioning of the permanent small mammal trapping stations in the Kivach State Nature Reserve: main results and discussion. Proceedings of the State Nature Reserve «Kivach» 3: 64–68. [In Russian]
Leinonen R., Itämies J., Kutenkova N. 1997. Lepidoptera of the Nature Reserve Friendship In: Ecosystems, fauna and flora of the Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve. Helsinki. P. 235–238.
Leis S.A., Leslie D.M., Engle D.M., Fehmi J.S. 2008. Small mammals as indicators of short-term and long-term disturbance in mixed prairie. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 137(1–3): 75–84. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9730-2
Lidicker W. 1988. Solving the Enigma of Microtine “Cycles". Journal of Mammalogy 69(2): 225–235. DOI: 10.2307/1381374
Liebhold A., Koenig W.D., Bjørnstad O.N. 2004. Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35(1): 467–490. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132516
Lissovsky A.A., Sheftel B.I., Saveljev A.P., Ermakov O.A., Kozlov Yu.A., Smirnov D.G., Stakheev V.V., Glazov D.M. 2019. Mammals of Russia: species list and applied issues. Archives of Zoological Museum of Moscow State University 56: 1–191. [In Russian]
Mackin-Rogalska R., Nabaglo L. 1990. Geographical variation in cyclic periodicity and synchrony in the common vole, Microtus arvalis. Oikos 59(3): 343–348. DOI: 10.2307/3545144
Mitchell-Jones A.J., Amori G., Bogdanowicz W., Kryštufek B., Reijnders P.J.H., Spitzenberger F., Stubbe M., Thissen J.B.M., Vohralik V., Zima J. 1999. The Atlas of European Mammals. London: T & A D Poyser. 484 p.
Morris D.W. 1996. Coexistence of specialist and generalist rodents via habitat selection. Ecology 77(8): 2352–2364. DOI: 10.2307/2265737
Pearce J., Venier L. 2005. Small mammals as bioindicators of sustainable boreal forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 208(1): 153–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.11.024
Peterson A.T., Soberón J., Sánchez-Cordero V. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285(5431): 1265–1267. DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5431.1265
Predavec M., Krebs C.J., Dannel K., Hyndman R. 2001. Cycles and synchrony in the collared lemming (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus) in Arctic North America. Oecologia 126(2): 216–224. DOI: 10.1007/s004420000516
Red Data Book of the Republic of Karelia. Petrozavodsk, 2007. 364 p. [In Russian]
Rosenzweig M.L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62(2): 327–335. DOI: 10.2307/1936707
Rosenzweig M.L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interaction: the search for mechanism. American Naturalist 137: 5–28. DOI: 10.1086/285137
Samelius G., Alisauskas R.T., Larivière S. 2011. Seasonal pulses of migratory prey and annual variation in small mammal abundance affect abundance and reproduction by arctic foxes. Polar Biology 34: 1475–1484. DOI: 10.1007/s00300-011-1005-2
Siivonen L. 1976. Pohjolan nisäkkäät (Mammals of Northern Europe). Helsinki: Otava. 232 p.
Siivonen L., Sulkava S. 1999. Mammals of the North. Helsinki: Otava. 224 p.
Sikkilya N.S. 2014. Faunal analysis of small mammals inhabiting Nature Reserve «Kostomukshskiy». Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University 2(139): 33–35. [In Russian]
Sundell J., Huitu O., Henttonen H., Kaikusalo A., Koprimaki E., Pietiäinen H., Saurola P., Hanski I. 2004. Large-scale spatial dynamics of vole populations in Finland revealed by the breeding success of vole-eating avian predators. Journal of Animal Ecology 73(1): 167–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00795.x
Sundell J., O'Hara R.B., Helle P., Hellstedt P., Henttonen H., Pietiäinen H. 2013. Numerical response of small mustelids to vole abundance: delayed or not? Oikos 122(7): 1112–1120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.00233.x
Yakimova A.E. 2018. The results of monitoring of small mammals in Central Karelia. Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences 1: 67–80. DOI: 10.17076/bg642 [In Russian]
Yakimova А.Е. 2020. Small Mammal Fauna of Nature Reserve «Kostomukshsky» on the results of the expedition of 2019. In: Karelia by the eyes of scientists: the main results of expeditionary activities – 2019. Petrozavodsk. P. 135–143. [In Russian]
Zhigalskii O.A. 2002. Analysis of small mammal's population dynamics. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 81(9): 1078–1106. [In Russian]
Zub K., Jędrzejewska B., Jędrzejewski W., Barton K.A. 2012. Cyclic voles and shrews and non-cyclic mice in a marginal grassland within European temperate forest. Acta Theriologica 57(3): 205–216. DOI: 10.1007/s13364-012-0072-2