Article

Article name ON SOME FACTORS DRIVING THE PRESENCE OF AMPHIBIANS IN WATER BODIES OF THE UPPER OKA BASIN (CENTRAL RUSSIA)
Authors

Vjacheslav A. Korzikov, Zoologist, Hygienic and Epidemiological Centre of the Kaluga Region (248021, Kaluga, Moskovskaya Street, 218, apartment 37); e-mail: korzikoff_va@mail.ru
Victor V. Aleksanov, Head of the organisational-mass department, Eco-Biological Centre for pupils in Kaluga Region (248023, Kaluga, M. Gorky Str., 52, apartment 27); e-mail: victor_alex@list.ru

Reference to article

Korzikov V.A., Aleksanov V.V. 2018. On some factors driving the presence of amphibians in water bodies of the Upper Oka Basin (Central Russia). Nature Conservation Research 3(Suppl.1): 110–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2018.059

Section Resarch articles
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2018.059
Abstract

A better understanding of the factors influencing the distribution of amphibians is needed to conserve amphibian species in regions highly populated by people. A total of 71 water bodies were examined in the Upper Oka Basin (the Central Part of the Russian Plain, Russia, Kaluga Oblast and adjacent regions). For each site, the presence and absence of 11 amphibian species were determined. We use the logistic regression within the glm function from the R Stats Package to estimate the influence of predictors on the probability of the species presence. The species with the highest occurrence were Pelophylax lessonae, P. ridibundus, Rana temporaria, and Bufo bufo. The type of terrestrial vegetation that surrounded the water body was a significant factor for three amphibian species. We found R. temporaria and B. bufo avoiding open habitats; and P. ridibundus avoiding wooded habitats. The degree of water moving was a significant factor for two amphibian species. Lissotriton vulgaris was present more frequent at lentic waters, and P. ridibundus preferred lotic waters. The percentage of the vegetation covering the water surface was a significant factor for Rana arvalis, which was more often present in water with 50% or more coverage. Acidity was a significant factor for Pseudepidalea viridis, which was detected only in neutral and alkaline waters. Total dissolved salts and the area of water body were significant predictors for no amphibian species. The presence of the Chinese sleeper (Perccottus glenii), an invasive fish species, was not significantly important in predicting detection or non-detection for any species. Many water bodies in the Upper Oka Basin that were likely once suitable for amphibians may not be occupied by amphibians due to barriers to dispersal from other sites and due to stochastic extinction. To estimate the capability of amphibian immigration from other sources, we identified the presence of lotic and lentic permanent water bodies within 1 km of a surveyed site. These factors were not significant for any species. Further investigations may achieve the best measure of connectivity of amphibian habitats. To conserve amphibians we need to keep terrestrial habitats surrounding the water bodies, especially wooded habitats.

Keywords

acidity, Amphibia, aquatic vegetation coverage, Chinese sleeper, lentic water, lotic water, River Oka, terrestrial vegetation, total dissolved salts, wooded habitat

Artice information

Received: 01.04.2018

The full text of the article
References

Alekseev S.K., Sionova M.N. 2002. Relation of amphibians (Amphibia) of Kaluga Oblast to urbanisation. Proceedings of the Kaluga Society of Nature Research in Native Land 5: 155–168. [In Russian]
Alford R.A., Richards S.J. 1999. Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30(1): 133–165. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.133
Araújo M.B., Thuiller W., Pearson R.G. 2006. Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. Journal of Biogeography 33(10): 1712–1728. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01482.x
Beebee T.J.C. 1981. Habitats of the British amphibians (4): Agricultural lowlands and a general discussion of requirements. Biological Conservation 21(2): 127–139. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(81)90075-6
Beebee T.J.C. 1983. Habitat selection by amphibians across an agricultural land-heathland transect in Britain. Biological Conservation 27(2): 111–124. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(83)90083-6
Collins J.P., Crump M.L., Lovejoy III T.E. 2009. Extinction in Our Times: Global Amphibian Decline. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 273 p.
Dinesman L.G. 1948. Adaptation of amphibians to different conditions of air humidity. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 27(3): 231–240. [In Russian]
Fayzulin A.I. 2010. Acidity analysis (pH) of spawning reservoirs as the ecological niche parameter of anurans of the middle Volga. Proceedings of Samara Scientific Centre of RAS 1(1): 122–125. [In Russian]
Flax N.L. 1986. Influence of acidity and water temperature on the survival of Sakhalin anurans. In: Systematics and ecology of amphibians and reptiles. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of AS USSR 157: 152–165. [In Russian]
Griffiths R.A., Sewell D., McCrea R.S. 2010. Dynamics of a declining amphibian metapopulation: survival, dispersal and the impact of climate. Biological Conservation 143(2): 485–491. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.017
Guerry A.D., Hunter Jr.M.L. 2002. Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture: an examination of landscape composition and configuration. Conservation Biology 16(3): 745–754. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00557.x
Hamer A.J., McDonnell M.J. 2008. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: a review. Biological Conservation 141(10): 2432–2449. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.020
Hartel T., Nemes S., Cogălniceanu D., Öllerer K., Schweiger O., Moga C.I., Demeter L. 2007. The effect of fish and aquatic habitat complexity on amphibians. Hydrobiologia 583(1): 173–182. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-006-0490-8
Kaufman B.Z. 1989. Preferencial behaviour of ectotermal vertebrates. Petrozavodsk: Karelian Research Centre of AS USSR. 149 p. [In Russian]
Korzikov V.A. 2016. The fauna and ecology of amphibians in the northwest of Upper Poochye. PhD Thesis Abstract. Togliatti. 20 p. [In Russian]
Korzikov V.A., Glushchenko A.M., Ruchin A.B. 2014. Trophology of five species of anurans larvae (Amphibia: Anura) from different habitats northwest top Poochya. Current Studies in Herpetology 14(3/4): 119–125. [In Russian]
Kutenkov A. 2017. Spatial-ecological divergence of the common frog (Rana temporaria L.) and the moor frog (Rana arvalis Nilss.) within their geographic ranges. Principles of the Ecology 6(1): 4–51. DOI: 10.15393/j1.art.2017.5065 [In Russian]
Kuzmin S.L. 2012. The Amphibians of the Former Soviet Union. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 370 p. [In Russian]
Lips K.R., Reeve J.D., Witters L.R. 2003. Ecological traits predicting amphibian population declines in Central America. Conservation Biology 17(4): 1078–1088. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01623.x
Loman J., Lardner B. 2006. Does pond quality limit frogs Rana arvalis and Rana temporaria in agricultural landscapes? A field experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology 43(4): 690–700. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01172.x
Marnell F. 1998. Discriminant analysis of the terrestrial and aquatic habitat determinants of the smooth newt (Triturus vulgaris) and the common frog (Rana temporaria) in Ireland. Journal of Zoology 244(1): 1–6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00001.x
Marsh D.M., Trenham P.C. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conservation Biology 15(1): 40–49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00129.x
Moore J.A. 1939. Temperature tolerance and rates of development in the eggs of Amphibia. Ecology 20(4): 459–478. DOI: 10.2307/1930439
Morrison C., Hero J. 2003. Geographic variation in life‐history characteristics of amphibians: a review. Journal of Animal Ecology 72(2): 270–279. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00696.x
Nikolaev V.I. 2007. Some ecological features of amphibians in bogs of the Upper Volga River Basin. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 86(9): 1113–1118. [In Russian]
Pellet J., Hoehn S., Perrin N. 2004. Multiscale determinants of tree frog (Hyla arborea L.) calling ponds in western Switzerland. Biodiversity and Conservation 13(12): 2227–2235. DOI: 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000047904.75245.1f
Plötner J., Köhler F., Uzzell T., Beerli P., Schreiber R., Guex G.D., Hotz H. 2009. Evolution of serum albumin intron-1 is shaped by a 5′ truncated non-long terminal repeat retrotransposon in western Palearctic water frogs (Neobatrachia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53(3): 784–791. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.07.037
R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
Red Data Book of Kaluga Region. Rare and Endangered Species of Animals. Kaluga, 2017. 406 p. [In Russian]
Reshetnikov A.N. 2003. The introduced fish, rotan (Perccottus glenii), depresses populations of aquatic animals (macroinvertebrates, amphibians, and a fish). Hydrobiologia 510(1–3): 83–90. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008634.92659.b4
Ruchin A.B., Alekseev S.K. 2008. On Rana temporaria (Anura, Amphibia) nutrition in Kaluga Region. Current Studies in Herpetology 8(1): 62–66. [In Russian]
Ruchin A.B., Lada G.A., Borkin L.Ya., Litvinchuk S.N., Rosanov Yu.M., Ryzhov M.K., Zamaletdinov R.I. 2009. On habitat distribution of three green frog species of the Rana esculenta complex in the Volga River basin. Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology 2: 273–280. [In Russian]
Semenov D.V., Leontyeva O.A., Pavlinov I.J. 2000. Analysis of the environmental determinants of the amphibian (Vertebrata: Amphibia) distribution on the urbanised territories in Moscow City. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Biological Series 105(2): 3–9. [In Russian]
Smirnov N.A. 2013. On the ecology of Rana dalmatina (Anura, Ranidae) in the territory of the Cis-Carpathians (Ukraine). In: Modern herpetology: problems and ways of their solutions. Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Young Herpetologists of Russia and neighboring countries (Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 25–27 November 2013). Saint-Petersburg. 137–140. [In Russian]
Smith M.A., Green D.M. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28(1): 110–128. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x
Stuart S.N., Chanson J.S., Cox N.A., Young B.E., Rodrigues A.S., Fischman D.L., Waller R.W. 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306(5702): 1783–1786. DOI: 10.1126/science.1103538
Svinin A.O. 2013. Distribution and population system types of green frogs (Pelophylax Fitzinger, 1843) in Mari El Republic. Current Studies in Herpetology 13(3/4): 119–125. [In Russian]
Valdez J.W., Stockwell M.P., Klop-Toker K., Clulow S., Clulow J., Mahony M.J. 2015. Factors driving the distribution of an endangered amphibian toward an industrial landscape in Australia. Biological Conservation 191: 520–528. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.010
Valdez J.W., Klop-Toker K., Stockwell M.P., Clulow S., Clulow J., Mahony M.J. 2016. Microhabitat selection varies by sex and age class in the endangered green and golden bell frog Litoria aurea. Australian Zoologist 38(2): 223–234. DOI: 10.7882/AZ.2016.031
Valdez J.W., Klop-Toker K., Stockwell M.P., Fardel, L., Clulow S., Clulow J., Mahony M.J. 2017. Differences in microhabitat selection patterns between a remnant and constructed landscape following management intervention. Wildlife Research 44(3): 248–258. DOI: 10.1071/WR16172
Vershinin V.L. 1995. Complex of Amphibia species in ecosystems of a big industrial city. Russian Journal of Ecology 26(4): 273–280. [In Russian]